Well, according to Michael Savage, it's all a conspiracy. See blacks hispanics, and arabs all got together and decided to migrate into white areas and then promote abortions and homosexuality in an effort to outbreed the "white" race. It's all a diabolical conspiracy that happened when white people were too busy watching the wayne brady show and eating morningstar vegetarian tv dinners to attend this meeting. 🤪
Originally posted by Mindship
Worldwide, through history, Caucasian Man always was the minority.
Which begs the question: How did Caucasian Man become the dominant force in human affairs?
What makes you think the caucasian man is the dominant minority in human affairs..😉
Quite honestly, I believe it's the Asians who control everything...think about it everything is made in either Japan, Taiwan or China nowadays, and a good portion of the world's population is in China..so yeah, I think we all should be fearing the Asians right about now...:fear:
Originally posted by whobdamandog
So case in point, Anglo Saxons and most of those considered "white", are indeed a "minority" when looking at race/ethnicity from a global perspective.
“minority” in this sense doesn’t really have a whole lot to do with population. women are a minority group after all, right?
a minority group is only considered as such when they are discriminated against by a dominant group that has greater power, privileges, and social status.
Originally posted by Morgoths_Wrath
“minority” in this sense doesn’t really have a whole lot to do with population. women are a minority group after all, right?a minority group is only considered as such when they are discriminated against by a dominant group that has greater power, privileges, and social status.
If a "white" Angle Saxon decides to live in India, Asia, Ethiopia, South America, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Ghana..etc..etc..etc..
Will he have greater privileges, a greater social status, or more power? ❌
Illusionary majority..nothing more..nothing less.
To be quite honest with you, I find the concept of race silly. We're all human. It's difficult to define an individual's race solely based on that individual's physical appearance.
True in Canada by the year (somewhere after 2017 can't remember) Canada will have a 17% minority population. 1 in 6 people.
So there are a lot of minorties in this country as some people think otherwise.
Canada's minority population has gone up, which is not a bad thing at all.
There has been massive growth around Toronto because of that.
I live in a suburb of Toronto called Brampton (pop 415,000)
Over 1/3 of the population is South Asian. Its almost 50% minorities and is growing really fast. It will have over 630,000 people by 2030.
By the way the city is a really good safe city. The south asian community take over this town where in 1990 it would be hard to see a minority person at all. All the growth of the city is driven by that group.
In Canada the demographics are changing as Toronto is 50% minorities (which are the majority now) and so are the bigger cities. However in rural areas or some medium size cities they have very small minority populations. All of them are in Greater Toronto area and Vancouver.
Originally posted by whobdamandog
If a "white" Angle Saxon decides to live in India, Asia, Ethiopia, South America, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Ghana..etc..etc..etc..Will he have greater privileges, a greater social status, or more power? ❌
Illusionary majority..nothing more..nothing less.
To be quite honest with you, I find the concept of race silly. We're all human. It's difficult to define an individual's race solely based on that individual's physical appearance.
We’re talking about GROUPS of people, not individuals. Remember?
and yes, the whole race issue is pretty pointless, but then again it's not going away anytime soon no matter how silly it might be
Originally posted by finti
and here we have Norwegians on holiday
Yeah, that's the way to holiday. I bet no taxi driver would dream of overcharging them just because they aren't local.
Actually in a way it reminds me of some of those bad vs. threads (not on KMC of course) - "Vikings vs. Drunken English Soccer Hooligans"
If a "white" Angle Saxon decides to live in India, Asia, Ethiopia, South America, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Ghana..etc..etc..etc..Will he have greater privileges, a greater social status, or more power? no
But then again just having a statistical majority doesn't always help, after all as we have seen, on a global political level the "west" is still a dominant force (with Asia and China very close) regardless of population majorities.
Originally posted by Morgoths_Wrath
We’re talking about GROUPS of people, not individuals. Remember?and yes, the whole race issue is pretty pointless, but then again it's not going away anytime soon no matter how silly it might be
If a large group of "white's" goes to any of these countries, will they receive special privileges, gain more power, etc? ❌
I'm a bit idealistic, so again..I concur with your second point as well. I believe society is progressively moving in a direction where one's faith/religion will play a crucial role in determining who they consider friend or foe. Just my pessimistic yet idealistic view on how this world is rapidly changing..😉
Originally posted by whobdamandog
If a large group of "white's" goes to any of these countries, will they receive special privileges, gain more power, etc? ❌
but still, like Imperial Samura said, on a global scale the western world has more political, societal, and economic dominance than other parts of the world
Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
But then again just having a statistical majority doesn't always help, after all as we have seen, on a global political level the "west" is still a dominant force (with Asia and China very close) regardless of population majorities.
You have a point, but unfortunately we're in a "Nuclear Age" and quite frankly..in this particular age, anyone is capable of winning the game.
Could be China, could be The US, could be India, could be Pakistan, could be Egypt, could be Africa..etc..etc.
Whichever country get's to the trigger first, will be considered the "dominant force."
Originally posted by Morgoths_Wrath
but still, like Imperial Samura said, on a global scale the western world has more political, societal, and economic dominance than other parts of the world
Kind of reminds me of that Disney/Pixar Movie titled "A bug's life"
I remember the grasshoppers always thought they had the ants under their heals..the ants did all of the work, while the grasshoppers reaped all the rewards.
Until one day, the ants finally started to realize that there were more of them than the grasshoppers.
I remember what happened to the grasshoppers at the end..and it wasn't pretty..😉
Originally posted by whobdamandog
You have a point, but unfortunately we're in a "Nuclear Age" and quite frankly..in this particular age, anyone is capable of winning the game.Could be China, could be The US, could be India, could be Pakistan, could be Egypt, could be Africa..etc..etc.
Whichever country get's to the trigger first, will be considered the "dominant force."
I think that the nuclear stalemate will keep the nuclear powers in line…that is until terrorists get ahold of them…scared