Top 10 players in NBA History

Started by koolruningz18 pages

I dont hate Vince at all, i dont even dislike him. I enjoy his highlight plays and think he has a very solid game. I think you get confused with best and favourite player thats all.

Originally posted by darth_royke
i dont think we hate vince.... i think we're fed up of hearing about him... wonder why?

try saying that to more than half of canada......

Originally posted by koolruningz
I dont hate Vince at all, i dont even dislike him. I enjoy his highlight plays and think he has a very solid game. I think you get confused with best and favourite player thats all.

but one thing i can say about vince is that, he is a favourite and one of the best. and guess who is starting for jermaine o'neal??? trust me. u think u know its gilbert arenas, but there has been a change in plans... take a guess, a wild guess. who other than gilbert arenas could POSSIBLY replace jermaine o'neal? lol. U GUESSED IT.

Seeing as the news has made you piss your pants im gonna guess ............................................................................... Carter. 😛

Not to mention Gilbert Arenas is a 6'4" guard. Carter has played SF for most of his career. Even then though, putting Carter in the line-up doesn't make sense because then you have LeBron at PF. LeBron on Duncan doesn't make much sense. Therefore it may be Dwight, Bosh, Rasheed, or Ben Wallace. One of the Wallace's would be the best option.

Originally posted by Myth
Not to mention Gilbert Arenas is a 6'4" guard. Carter has played SF for most of his career. Even then though, putting Carter in the line-up doesn't make sense because then you have LeBron at PF. LeBron on Duncan doesn't make much sense. Therefore it may be Dwight, Bosh, Rasheed, or Ben Wallace. One of the Wallace's would be the best option.

no one else but arenas or carter is going to take the starting spot, and it makes more sense to put vince in than arenas because the east needs more size, and it would be much more enjoyable to watch cause vince brings a new sick highlight that makes me jump outta my seat every all star game....arenas....not so much.

i fthe east needs more size then surely bosh, dwight or the wallaces will get in? i mite be biasd... but i'd go for bosh😄 either him or dwight. sod the wallaces, they'll probably get a ring at the end of the year, and it aint like sheed wanted to be there

There is no way in hell Gilbert will be starting. Heck, he only made it on the bench as an alternate, why would he then surpass everybody else and then start?

Originally posted by Myth
There is no way in hell Gilbert will be starting. Heck, he only made it on the bench as an alternate, why would he then surpass everybody else and then start?

WOW myth we agreed on something. anyways, i heard this when i was watching the nets vs pistons game, and the announcers said that flip saunders(if that is how 2 spell his name) is going to give vince the starting spot because he DESERVES it.

The question remains though, how is the line up of AI, Wade, Bron, Vince and Shaq gonna match up with the West? Vince is not a PF so how are they gonna start him?

Originally posted by koolruningz
The question remains though, how is the line up of AI, Wade, Bron, Vince and Shaq gonna match up with the West? Vince is not a PF so how are they gonna start him?

i dont know, i am just telling u what i heard and what probably will happen.

I didnt expect you to have an answer, i was just pointing out the problems that starting 5 would have.

Originally posted by koolruningz
The question remains though, how is the line up of AI, Wade, Bron, Vince and Shaq gonna match up with the West? Vince is not a PF so how are they gonna start him?

Thats why it didn't make sense. This will mean LeBron will be bumped to PF at the beginning of the game. I'm thinking that it won't take long for subs to come in to even out the size.

I agree that Vince is playing better than everybody else on the East bench, but it doesn't make sense. Thats why I figured they could make a case for one of the Wallace's to start since they are on the Pistons. I say start Ben Wallace to guard Duncan because you still couldn't argue that Wallace doesn't deserve to start. Ben Wallace is a C in a PF's body anyway.

I agree Myth its nothing against Carter (who is playing well enough to start) it just common sense to match big man against big man.

IMO, Myth's list very closely resembles mine. However, I'd live Russell off and put Duncan on. And I wouldn't have Julius Erving on. Though I do agree with him, that finding a 10th would be incredibly difficult to do.

either way, I CANNOT WAIT for the all star festivities to begin... a lot of big name players and all stars participating on saturday and sunday night. by the way, for all the raptor fans, mike james has decided to enter the 3 point shootout.

Originally posted by koolruningz
I didnt expect you to have an answer, i was just pointing out the problems that starting 5 would have.

u didnt just state a problem, its was a question, i gave an answer that i could because i was the only one to say that vince is going to be in the starting lineup instead of arenas.

Originally posted by BobbyD
IMO, Myth's list very closely resembles mine. However, I'd live Russell off and put Duncan on. And I wouldn't have Julius Erving on. Though I do agree with him, that finding a 10th would be incredibly difficult to do.

Russell was a for sure for me. Duncan, Malone, and Stockton were all close for me as the #10 man.

Originally posted by tanjot
u didnt just state a problem, its was a question, i gave an answer that i could because i was the only one to say that vince is going to be in the starting lineup instead of arenas.

I think the thing was, he wasn't asking you or anybody on here for an explanation. He's questioning in the sense that it is questionable to put Carter in the line-up. Therefore, it really was more of a statement.

Thanks Myth, it wasnt a question as such i said " The question remains though" meaning there is a question of how that starting line up would work. I didnt mean for you to take it so literally, i will be clearer in the future.