Originally posted by Filth
If you must call it that yes....
Of course all the freedom in the world doesn't mean anything if a guy with a larger stick then yours comes along and decides it's his right to take that last can of out of date baked beans from you. Yeah, the can you were saving for a rainy day. Or those who inevitably abuse things. The one who imposes his power of freedom over others, and there is no one to stop them.
Anarchy isn't a particuarly pleasing option.
There is some benifit to living in a system with laws and protection and food production and the like. A benefit to people getting along.
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
The idea of fair renumeration for produce, the choice to do what you want, when you want, society supporting each other for the communal good. I think that's an ideal ideal 😉 but impossible in reality.
Well, but that's not freedom. Some might consider it an ideal, I don't i think an individula in that society is not free and that'S what Liberal Democracies and Enlightened Anarchism is about. Naive Anarchism obviously relates more to Marxism.