why do all movies in the second part suck ?

yeah that's something i don't know 😕

Not all of them do..? Got any examples?

Dude! The first Saw was awful, the second was GREAT!

But I do know where your coming from. Most horror movies have awful sequels and crap.

Like A Nightmare on Elmstreet!

Hellraiser 2 was amazin.

Saw 2, Hellraiser 2, Child's Play 2, Evil Dead 2, Halloween 2, all examples of great sequels.

It's the crappy sequels that give sequels a bad name.

I think he means, in the 2nd half of the movie..

Don't think so, boss. Movies are broken down in 3 acts, and anyone that thinks they have 2 "halves", shouldn't be watching movies.

Originally posted by Cinemaddiction
Don't think so, boss. Movies are broken down in 3 acts, and anyone that thinks they have 2 "halves", shouldn't be watching movies.

3 acts, yes.

But there is still such a thing as the 2nd half of a movie.

There's a difference between the amount of Segments of a movie, all depending on the type of person viewing it.

I'm not disagreeing with you, By the way. Although it may sound like it. 😬

Either way, the thread starter is wrong.

😬

If he did mean two halves of a movie, then that would suggest that the introduction is always better than the climax of the movie.

Originally posted by dontworry x3
yeah that's something i don't know 😕

Thats bullshit

Friday the 13 part 2

Halloween 2

Originally posted by BackFire
Either way, the thread starter is wrong.

Agreed