Originally posted by King_Mungi
Stops at 3, if people were unanimous that Tanaraq would destroy Wonder Woman I don't see BA fairing better.
That was a few people. Its not forum wide opinion. I certainly dont see Tanaraq beating Wonder woman. He is too unproven and just doesnt have the range of feats to make such an opinion anything more than speculation based.
Originally posted by King_Mungi
He's an immortal god, who is far into the 100 class, and a full powered beast as said by Shaman you can't beat only just delay them. As said in various other threads he was much like Classic Juggernaut.
Character talk when not backed up by on panel feats is not conclusive. Shaman as a source is not infallible.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Character talk when not backed up by on panel feats is not conclusive. Shaman as a source is not infallible.
Check out the Wonderwoman vs. Sasquatch battle and the Sasquatch vs. Juggernaut one as well. Actually Shaman's whole point of living is to battle the Great Beasts, same with Snowbird so he knows what he is talking about.
Originally posted by King_Mungi
Check out the Wonderwoman vs. Sasquatch battle and the Sasquatch vs. Juggernaut one as well. Actually Shaman's whole point of living is to battle the Great Beasts, same with Snowbird so he knows what he is talking about.
Its all about perspective. The Olympians are said by other characters to be immortal and indestructible but theyre conclusively not. Same with Juggernaut (need i mention Nimrod and Onslaught to name a few) Shaman is not stated or shown to be omniscient, while he might be clued up on the great Beasts his word regarding them is not conclusive canon fact. When Tanaraq has some on panel feats then we'll be able to draw a comparison about how he'd fare in battle with Wonder woman who has a multitude of high level on panel showings. What youre doing is the equivalent of accepting the apparrent heroes talk of Sentry stalemating Galactus and treating it as canon fact. Without on panel feats to back up the words, a narrator captions or similar official source (handbooks) you cant take Shamans words and treat them as gospel in debate.
Tanaraq Sasquatch's feats dont stack up against Adam he's not fast enough or strong enough to defeat Adam i dont think he could beat Juggernaut either Shamain shouldnt have said what he said but then again even though he said it even juggernaut has been defeated by people with lower indurance thus i give adam going to number 5 and being defeated by WW.
Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Its all about perspective. The Olympians are said by other characters to be immortal and indestructible but theyre conclusively not. Same with Juggernaut (need i mention Nimrod and Onslaught to name a few) Shaman is not stated or shown to be omniscient, while he might be clued up on the great Beasts his word regarding them is not conclusive canon fact. When Tanaraq has some on panel feats then we'll be able to draw a comparison about how he'd fare in battle with Wonder woman who has a multitude of high level on panel showings. What youre doing is the equivalent of accepting the apparrent heroes talk of Sentry stalemating Galactus and treating it as canon fact. Without on panel feats to back up the words, a narrator captions or similar official source (handbooks) you cant take Shamans words and treat them as gospel in debate.
Actually his daughter is [Talisman] and she said the same thing. Also if you check what I wrote in the Wonder Woman thread I said we don't know what he is fully capable of. However, your simply writing him off like Tanaraq is a chump, when the Great Beasts are older than man and even the world itself. "The Great Beasts employ death and decay against mankind". As said you can't kill them, Tanaraq got his heart ripped out by Snowbird who transformed into Tanaraq but he is still alive. Also with Sentry, we havn't even seen him fully unleashed so how can we say it's wrong or not? Same situation here, you assume Tanaraq is a push-over when I say he and the comics are not.
Originally posted by Mider
Tanaraq Sasquatch's feats dont stack up against Adam he's not fast enough or strong enough to defeat Adam i dont think he could beat Juggernaut either Shamain shouldnt have said what he said but then again even though he said it even juggernaut has been defeated by people with lower indurance thus i give adam going to number 5 and being defeated by WW.
Ummm...why shouldn't Shaman say what he said? The Great Beasts use to rule the world until the Gods of the Arctic banished them into their own realm millions of years ago. Also regular old Sasquatch has caught Northstar who's crusing speed is mach 10.