X vs Zero

Started by Shin_Gouken2 pages
Originally posted by Blue nocturne
genius no they don't in games like street fighter when the low tier characters can survive f5 tornado's while the top tiers are just lifting boulders how do you decide who wins based on feats alone seems like your the crack head here. 😉

Man, I know street fighter but I'm afraid I can't see how what your saying applies, please elaborate.Anyway, feats are a great way of determing a character's ability to get out of sticky situations (something Zero will do a lot of). And besides thats not what acrosurge was saying. He said that their were a few things that allow X to be the victor. Feats was only one of them.

Batman has beaten Superman around 7 times in the comic book world.

Proof that feats don't determine battles.

Also, pro martial artist have taken down pro-body builders.

More proof.

I never said they detemine battles. I said they help. And you're all going off topic.

Originally posted by Shin_Gouken
I never said they detemine battles. I said they help. And you're all going off topic.
I totally agree. Feats alone do not win battles, which is why I provided other, strong points as to why a character should win, such as combat ability, experience, and range of powers.

Can anyone provide a reason as to why Zero would win with both combatants are at their utmost power?

Just for kicks, here's a CG pic of X with his Ultimate Armor (mk III).

And another for Zero. Pic is from Planet Megaman.

I don't really know much about either to tell you the truth. Zero is more experienced than X, but X has more potential. But Ultimate X is a character I know almost nothiang about.

Originally posted by Shin_Gouken
I never said they detemine battles. I said they help. And you're all going off topic.

Then what are we arguing about?

Originally posted by Shin_Gouken
I don't really know much about either to tell you the truth. Zero is more experienced than X, but X has more potential. But Ultimate X is a character I know almost nothiang about.
Not true. Zero started out with more experience, though by the time X reached his highest potential power, X had been fighting for a century longer than Zero.

Unknown X is simply the name used to define X at the highest power he ever reached. Similarly, Maverick Zero is Zero's form at his highest potential power, unlocked when he allows his DNA to be fully integrated with the Maverick (or Zero) Virus. Here's a pic of Zero building up to become Maverick Zero.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Then what are we arguing about?

I think it was something like "feats help determine battles". But I won that argument so don't worry about going back to it. lol 😄

Originally posted by Shin_Gouken
I think it was something like "feats help determine battles". But I won that argument so don't worry about going back to it. lol 😄

You didn't win anything I said feats don't win battles you said yes and now you say they just help... 😛

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
You didn't win anything I said feats don't win battles you said yes and now you say they just help... 😛
*Does the happy peace-keeper dance*

And now for something no one asked to see:

...The latest art style for classic Mega Man (not X, the original Mega Man)!

May I introduce you to the sickeningly cute, Mega Man: Powered Up!!!

I originally said feats determine battles. That implies that they help. You originally said that they don't determine battles at all.
I win 😄

Originally posted by Shin_Gouken
I originally said feats determine battles. That implies that they help. You originally said that they don't determine battles at all.
I win 😄

I posted feats "don't win battles" you replied "Yes they do" how did that imply they help in that post?

You never said they helped until a few post after yet now you say you were implying it when you posted before despite the fact you simply said "yes they do".......Riiiggghttt 🙄

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
You never said they helped until a few post after yet now you say you were implying it when you posted before despite the fact you simply said "yes they do".......Riiiggghttt 🙄

"Yes they do" means feats play a roll in winning battles. So they really can be our final deciding factor for who wins. "Yes they do," however, by no means implies that they are the only deciding factor in winning battles. I also did not say they win battles all the time, so again, "yes they do, feats do win plenty of battles." Oh, and saying "feats don't win battles" implies that they never do. 😄

Man... we could go on forever like this...

I know since were just typing there's no way of truying knowing what the other imply ed so lets just forget about it.