How would Gimli fare against Legolas?

Started by Blaxican_Hydra4 pages
Originally posted by ESB - 1138
He won by 1 kill that's real pwnge right there huh? A dwarf is afraid to go underground and an elf isn't? (Path of the Dead)

That was in the movie, and in the books Gimli wins by more. Peter JAckson is just homsexual and so he wanted to LEgolas to be sexy. Half of the crap he does in the movies he doesn't do in the books.

And considering the fact that LEgolas ahd nineteen whiel Gimli had 2..how did he catch up so fast?

even though legolas is foo foo,he would win.dwarves may be fast sprinters or whatever but an elf has gosta be faster.

yeh, elves are faster than dwarves but i dont think they wqould fight anyway so because they r friends, there more likely to be doing this 🍺

lol.yeah maybe gimli, but legolas would be drinking wine like a sissy

no remember in the films legolas out drinks gimli

yup, in the hobbits those elves get drunk liek no tomarrow.

Originally posted by Jarshewa
lol.yeah maybe gimli, but legolas would be drinking wine like a sissy

Legolas beat Gimli in a drinking contest so what would that make Gimli?

Better than Legolas.

when does legolas outdrink gimli in the movie?
i must of missed that.............

(offtrack question...do you think tolkien smoked weed,or was just always refering to tabacky)

1. It was a deleted scene, so you could only see it in special edition.

2. Yes he did smoke weed.

im a cheap bastard,but i bought the special edition to "the fellowship" so i take it it wasnt in that.

id enjoy to see that though.

Its in the ROTK EE

Yeah.

thanx-time to find 30 bucks

Originally posted by ESB - 1138
Dwarves or not natural sprinters. The only reason you say that is because Gimli said it. Gimli said it because an elf was leaving him in the dust and Gimli didn't like that. Legolas has duel swords that he can wield pretty well as shown in the Two Towers and Legolas (in the movie) took down a Mumakil which Gimli could only dream of doing.

Gimli was tired because he was running for so long. But i wont argue that Legolas is the better runner

Originally posted by Council#13
Gimli was tired because he was running for so long. But i wont argue that Legolas is the better runner

Aragon and Legolas were still holding strong. Gimli was falling further and further behind.

This still alive? I thought it was quite clear in the books that Gimli > Legolas, though not by much. Tolkien stated himself that Legolas did the least out of the Fellowship.

That's why movie Legolas is a bad incarnation. Fanboys flock to him and defend him even when's he's outclassed.

Anyways, if Legolas starts with a good distance and gets a good shot he'll win. He has no real chance in melee combat.

Originally posted by Revolver Ocelot
This still alive? I thought it was quite clear in the books that Gimli > Legolas, though not by much. Tolkien stated himself that Legolas did the least out of the Fellowship.

That's why movie Legolas is a bad incarnation. Fanboys flock to him and defend him even when's he's outclassed.

Anyways, if Legolas starts with a good distance and gets a good shot he'll win. He has no real chance in melee combat.

Originally posted by Blaxican_Hydra
That was in the movie, and in the books Gimli wins by more. Peter JAckson is just homsexual and so he wanted to LEgolas to be sexy. Half of the crap he does in the movies he doesn't do in the books.

And considering the fact that LEgolas ahd nineteen whiel Gimli had 2..how did he catch up so fast?

No, everything here is in the book as well, he only wins by 1 and he is afraid to walk down to the undead (but what the hell has this with the fight to do?).

He did not kill a mumuk in the books. He did not slide down a flight of stairs on a sheild killing ten orcs, and he did not jump on the back of a fercocious troll and shoot it in the head. Half of the things he did were exxagerations.