Poll
36%
64%
Tulkas (I don't know if it's the same name in English as in Swedish) wrestled Melkor down when he fleed into his last chambre and chained him. So if all the Valar came at the same time they would defeat him easily. Didn't it mean that it required all the Valar to defeat Melkor and his armies, not just Melkor alone.
Re: Melkor ( Full power) vs The Valar ( The Rest ), Feanor and Fingolfin.
Originally posted by w00t2112
Ok, it was stated that Melkor was more powerful than all the other valar combined when melkor was at the peak of his power, but adding fingolfin and feanor? i want to see everyone's thoughts.
No, Melkor (Morgoth) is stronger then the Valar one on one but their combined strength is too great for the dark one to handle.
Re: Melkor ( Full power) vs The Valar ( The Rest ), Feanor and Fingolfin.
Originally posted by Deception
Ok, it was stated that Melkor was more powerful than all the other valar combined when melkor was at the peak of his power, but adding fingolfin and feanor? i want to see everyone's thoughts.
wrong, silmarillion only says he was the mightiest of the valar, not mightier then all the valar together. And as Kamikz says, Tulkas beats him one on one. and he is chained with a chain made by Aüle. That's only two of the valar.