*BEATS OWN HEAD AGAINST WALL*
*THEN YOURS*
I can't argue very well right now because your all's arguments are so ignorant and blatantly wrong, (sprouting off the first things that come to your so-called minds), that it's foolproof, and I can't argue around it to save my life..................help me some one! I know someone out there is sane! Ban them please?! NOW?!
Originally posted by grey fox
And i don't believe i [b]know . Juggernaut cannot be harmed or killed in any way possible .Onslaught hurting him proves that the writers were on crack.
[/B]
Or simply that Onslaught dished out more damage than Cytorrak's magical protection could feasibly handle. Everything has a limit, after all. But probably the writer/crack scenario is more likely....just throwing out a different possibility.
Originally posted by APOCALYPSE NUR
*BEATS OWN HEAD AGAINST WALL**THEN YOURS*
I can't argue very well right now because your all's arguments are so ignorant and blatantly wrong, (sprouting off the first things that come to your so-called minds), that it's foolproof, and I can't argue around it to save my life..................help me some one! I know someone out there is sane! Ban them please?! NOW?!
keep spouting crap like this and you will be the one thats baned.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
Or simply that Onslaught dished out more damage than Cytorrak's magical protection could feasibly handle. Everything has a limit, after all. But probably the writer/crack scenario is more likely....just throwing out a different possibility.
But that raises the question of how Onslaught was able to effectively negate an enchantment of a Skyfather. At the point he ripped the ruby from Juggy, Onslaught didn't have either Nate's or Franklin's power or any magic power that I know of.
Originally posted by TheKahn
But that raises the question of how Onslaught was able to effectively negate an enchantment of a Skyfather. At the point he ripped the ruby from Juggy, Onslaught didn't have either Nate's or Franklin's power or any magic power that I know of.
i've always tried looking at it like this:
psionic power was always juggs vulnerability. since onslaught was charlie minus all restraint, perhaps he was simply able to overcome the shielding of his helmet and psionically remove the gem. i never understood why the gem was in him in the first place though . ..
in other words . . .
basically, the writers wanted to make onslaught look like a bad ass, so he took out one of the biggest guns in one of the most stunning ways.
or, to say it in another way . . .
pis. 🙁
Originally posted by leonidas
i've always tried looking at it like this:psionic power was always juggs vulnerability. since onslaught was charlie minus all restraint, perhaps he was simply able to overcome the shielding of his helmet and psionically remove the gem. i never understood why the gem was in him in the first place though . ..
in other words . . .
basically, the writers wanted to make onslaught look like a bad ass, so he took out one of the biggest guns in one of the most stunning ways.
or, to say it in another way . . .
pis. 🙁
That sounds about right. I just wish they had used Onslaught for more that a plot device. He could have been a real quality villian.
Originally posted by leonidas
i've always tried looking at it like this:psionic power was always juggs vulnerability. since onslaught was charlie minus all restraint, perhaps he was simply able to overcome the shielding of his helmet and psionically remove the gem. i never understood why the gem was in him in the first place though . ..
in other words . . .
basically, the writers wanted to make onslaught look like a bad ass, so he took out one of the biggest guns in one of the most stunning ways.
or, to say it in another way . . .
pis. 🙁
Originally posted by TheKahn
That sounds about right. I just wish they had used Onslaught for more that a plot device. He could have been a real quality villian.
Thank-you for re-stating what i said earlier on 😄