Can I?

Started by redcaped59 pages

Are we numbers or letters?

Numbers are different shapes (forget math) recognized when put together no matter the order and words are just the same...different shapes (called letters) that form a word and words the idea or sentence. Alright, more deeply thought...numbers are a picture and letters are a command. Why? A picture expresses the structure by any category measure or weight and a letter is an order or command...it leads the action. So what are we or you in this case?

...........................working hard.

But, there is a limit. What makes the limit

..................................getting drunk.

Imma slap u!

No one will be slapping anyone.............when it's not being done by me.

*slap*

is it comprehensible.....

Be gone flea. Go jump on someone else.

😮 my name is hah...my name is what...my name's teeky teeky whhhhnnnnnggg Curtain Call (mnm)

Originally posted by Valharu
Be gone flea. Go jump on someone else.

Be gone rodent. Go nibble on someone else's feces.

is it comprehensible.....

Originally posted by InnerRise
Be gone rodent. Go nibble on someone else's feces.

is it comprehensible.....

F*cking sad. You and your post.

Sometimes you've got to keep a thought to yourself, but I'm not selfish in any ways. Just imagine the entire KMC is a program running by itself that only "you" are real. Incredibly sophisticated isn't it...then "who" would sound more real to you? Again, this is just my imagination. Thought you need entertainment...so, take it...it's ok. Again, it's ok....always fine.

Originally posted by redcaped
Think of the world upside down...everything you do and live are the same, except for the interior in opposite direction but still the same. I mean same look outside but reverse inside. Same cars on the road but reverse...you look up to see the road and down the sky. You are not upside down...just everything except us. Yes, it is a more advanced technology and that's our world instead. Well do you like my kind of dream fantasy?

😂 Thats trippy

Yes, gravity comes from space. No ocean, water is self contained. The last floor would be the first...almost like boxes. We're not outside but inside...that's my point. This gravity only pools living things, not objects. We constructed everything and our origin came from cocoons like plants...so that explains our existence throughout a very long period of evolution and development. We built the city because we don't want to be fallen leaves. blah blah just fiction.

Want to create more threads? Here are some.

The how do you feel today/What was the last thing you heard/Plans for tomorrow or any other day/The last time you were sick/The what am I thinking now/What did you write last/Last time you peed or sheed/Last email message/Last phone call/Last bill/Last drink (anything)/Last time it rained/Last kiss/Last time you got paid/Last time you fart/Last time you got dressed/Last date/What did you buy last/Last time you wore sunglasses/The recent shower/Last time you felt pain/Where did you go last time/Last time you laughed/Last time you were impressed/What did you read last/What did you see last/The last spit/Last nasal cleaning/Last time you smoked/Last time you were angry/The time you woke up last/Last teeth brush/Last time you yelled and what/etc...

Worth our attention

2006 years making history. Practically nothing today seems to be new and if there is, it will always have a point of origin quite familiar to us. One thing we haven't found yet...our sensitivity works individually, we cannot make certain of others. Humor for instant comes from known things in many different versions, but so far you know it. We live in hunger of proves. You would give or do anything to find out about the things you care. I know exactly how & what I feel...very misleading in terms of effect by losing confidence and expectations. You may or may not have something valuable known for sure...what you see or hear can be deceiving or just the opposite from your real condition. I am a very attached person and for this reason I wish to be off for a while. I want the sun to heal me. I've made an exception, foolishly but that's me...I need a good rest after all. Do not expect me back for at least September. It's tough to be me...true!

I'll miss ya man. So.......................see ya next week then? 🍺

😆 she knows she's pink...I love pink! oooohhhh See ya September 1st. I have to leave for a while or I'll go crazy.

The Wizard Q&A Bryan Singer: Despite working feverishly on "Superman Returns" the director invites Wizard to his home to talk movie rumors, the physics of Superman and his plans for possible sequels. By Mike Cotton: Bryan Singer still gets chills when he thinks of the great white shark rising from the sea, rows of teeth glistening in the sun, readying for a killing strike that rips men in half and turns the oceans red with blood. Their lifeless eyes, black and beady, terrify him with their starkness. Their evolution over thousands of years into perfect killing machines that do nothing but swim, eat and reproduce still tickle his imagination. To this day, Singer remains fascinated_albeit petrified_of the fiercest crature on the planet, the great white shark. And he owes it all to his favorite movie of all time, Steven Spielberg's 1975 classic, "Jaws." "I've got to show you this," says the 40-year-old director as he feverishly hunts through his Hollywood home, before stumbling onto the book he's looking for, which features a section chronicling various facts about shark attacks and the making of "Jaws." "[Jaws'is] still terrifying,"he admits."That's why I won't go swimming in Australia. In Adelaide, a kid got ripped in half by two great whites. They devoured him right in front of friends.""That was right when we got there and it completely freaked me out,"recalls Singer of his first few weeks in Sydney shooting "Superman Returns,"which is now just weeks from opening on June 30. With smash hits like "X-Men,""X2"and"The Usual Suspects" under his belt, Singer has earned his pedigree in Hollywood. But after trying to revive the two-decade-dead Superman franchise, Singer has nothing but respect for peers like "Jaws" director Spielberg. "[Spielberg's] 26 years old [when making `Jaws'] and he has no idea.

Do you pay attention to online buzz? Honestly, I hardly over do, but Dan [Harris] and Mike [Dougherty], my writers, they're a bit more internet-savvy than I am. If I start looking at that stuff it'll drive me crazy. A lot of it is strange. Sometimes it's fun. Every once in a while you'll have a night where I'll have a friend over and they get on the computer and start showing me [message board posts] that are very funny. Someone will be slamming me and then someone is defending me and it felt very much like high school. It was like I was the geek in high school and someone was going off on me and some nice girl jumped to me defence. This could have been a really campy movie, so was it hard to find the balance between light and dark? Yeah, our Superman is a much more vulnerable Superman than you've seen before because his predicament is one of greater vulnerability. He's come back and this woman he cares for has moved on. He's stuck between a kriptonite rock and a hard place. But ultimately, the toughest part was making Superman fly. It's very challenging from a physical and practical F/X standpoint. I'm constantly combining the two. Deliberating on the physics of Superman and keeping it believable and keeping you emotionally involved in the story is so challenging-F/X-wise, it's just hard. The time involved in shooting is ultimately the hardest part. By the end, it's just very daunting.

You always employed a science-for lack of a better word-to how the X-Men's powers worked. If Magneto was going to fly, he used some kind of metal below his feet. But Superman isn't like that; the Marvel and DC Universes are very different in the comics. Did you find that in the films? Yeah, it's a real study in the physics of superheroes-how heavy is an airplane, how does an explosion [affect Superman], how much does he flinch at gunfire? The scientific logic is the density of the planet Krypton is like that of a white dwarf [star], which would make him so powerful, but the planet's red sun had a specific radiation that has a normalizing effect. But when he's exposed to our yellow sun, he draws his power from it. That's actually a line in the movie. So it's not necessary for him to constantly be charged. He's not a solar pannel necessarily, but the sun is the source of his power; it's his Kryptonian heritage. If Superman is shot, let's say...does his costume rip? No. It's the same properties-this is the logic I'm applying and whether you embrace it is up to you. The same properties that make up Superman's flesh and bones are the same properties of his suit-they're normal on Krypton, but here they're super. That's not to say that every piece of Kriptonite or object from Krypton would all be invincible, but they're all cut from the same cloth and the suit is part of that technology. The suit is a mixture of some fabric that was sent with him-which was established in the Donner film as well-and perhaps assembled with the technology in the Fortress of Solitude. In our movie, the technology is all crystal-based. Crystals grow in real life, and crystal technology can grow all kind of things. So that same technology applies: a crystal was sent with him, and that same technology helped assemble a suit and the Fortress of Solitude and ultimately would be his guidance and source of knowledge. These are things I took from Donner film.