Re: Coded Speak - The New PC?
Originally posted by PVS
-I'm sure not all homosexuals are peadophiles, but you cant deny that when a man rapes a little boy, he's a homosexual. (homosexuality and peadophilia are directly linked)
Not true. So all the Catholic Priests who molest children must be homosexual then? Not true.
Homosexuals are attracted to men. Pedophiles are attracted to children, girls or boys. Homosexuals are NOT pedophiles, and pedophiles are NOT homosexuals.
Re: Re: Coded Speak - The New PC?
Originally posted by Makedde
Not true. So all the Catholic Priests who molest children must be homosexual then? Not true.Homosexuals are attracted to men. Pedophiles are attracted to children, girls or boys. Homosexuals are NOT pedophiles, and pedophiles are NOT homosexuals.
Originally posted by RedAlertv2
I think you missed the point.
Re: Re: Coded Speak - The New PC?
Originally posted by Makedde
Not true. So all the Catholic Priests who molest children must be homosexual then? Not true.Homosexuals are attracted to men. Pedophiles are attracted to children, girls or boys. Homosexuals are NOT pedophiles, and pedophiles are NOT homosexuals.
well...she's trying and we should commend her for that.
^^^^
see, thats not coded speak. thats tact and grace 🙂
Originally posted by Makedde
I read the first post. You say that all pedophiles are homosexuals. That's the same as saying that all homosexuals are pedophiles.
you read the first sentence and ran with it.
it was an example of coded speak. now go back and
read the post. contribute something relevant or please stfu.
yeah there are more and more so called coded speak, but it is more and more that look for so called coded speak when there is non as well. Meaning that in certain political discussions, at least here in Norway, debaters look for coded speak all the time in their opponents even if it is kind of straight forward arguments that are being raised.
Re: Coded Speak - The New PC?
Originally posted by PVSA decade and a half later, we have coded speak everywhere this thread was prophetic.13 years ago.
-I'm sure not all homosexuals are peadophiles, but you cant deny that when a man rapes a little boy, he's a homosexual. (homosexuality and peadophilia are directly linked)-many people died during ww2, jews were a fraction. im not denying that many were killed. (the jews were never systematically killed, they were just casualties of war)
-many blacks are decent people, but just look at them all looting and killing after katrina. they were out of control and i support the decision to shoot first and ask questions later. (black people who are not obedient should be shot, white people who have committed the same crime were simply 'looking for food'😉
im talking about coded speak. a recent mutation of the dreaded PC, which the right claims to never use, and is soley a tool of the left. but is it? i have found in reading and listening to those of the extreme right, that they weild the art of PC like a samurai master weilds a katana. a tool which allows them to not directly admit their beliefs, but at the same time not deny them in the least.
i find that when the left decides upon PC terms, its just that. terms. no hidden meaning, but rather a dillusion of true meaning. a clumsy attempt to sophisticate our terminology, when in fact it only tends to delete any meaning from the subject of the term. of coarse i refer to the ridiculous side of PC. the side which calls black people "african american" when i have yet to meet a single black person who is offended or affected in any way by being called "black". but is there really a change in message behind these terms? or just a load of unnecessary syllables and hyphens? its annoying, but i honestly dont feel threatened by this manner of control.
what prompted me to make this thread was a budding off-topic debate on mel gibson in the holocaust denier thread. mel weilds PC in a way which allows him to dodge the question of "do you believe the holocaust was real?" and escape without a scratch. (response was similar to the above paraphrased example).
i have seen a growing trend in coded speak over recent years. it seems commonplace in debates over homosexuality, terrorism, racism, and all other hot button issues. seek and ye shall find.
anyone care to elaborate/confirm/deny my observation?
I had lurked stormfront and other racist forums back then, since a wise woman named shi-tzu once said 'know your enemy'. anyhoo I noticed that, almost overnight, they all stopped dropping n-bombs and other slurs. they would be like "what a beautiful culture" at an article/video of criminality involving black people. some would get too excited and let the slurs fly, but he would be quickly (yet gently) chided by his peers.
Originally posted by Bashar TegYeah, I think the rest of us noticed a little later. How they had become far more insidious and far better at hiding in plain site. The coded speech they use now is clear to you and I, some people here still miss it I think.
I had lurked stormfront and other racist forums back then, since a wise woman named shi-tzu once said 'know your enemy'. anyhoo I noticed that, almost overnight, they all stopped dropping n-bombs and other slurs. they would be like "what a beautiful culture" at an article/video of criminality involving black people. some would get too excited and let the slurs fly, but he would be quickly (yet gently) chided by his peers.