Who Was The Father Of Jesus?

Started by Cyber Ninja3 pages

Jesus is the brother of buddah which is the brother of allah which is the brother of shock

Originally posted by maham
u most probably wudn't the place,but don't worry ,no riots happened here lol 😄

uhhh i LIVE in pakistan maham, islamabad 🙂 . used to live in lahore before but moved, trust me i know pakistan inside out, so tell me, where do u live,{dont worry i wont kill ya 😛 }

i m not worried abt that either lol

it's Loralai cuz my dads in army so v hav to move frm place to place after every 2 or 3 yrs ,but i actually belong to Lahore

Originally posted by maham
if he can b born without a father n that wasn't hard fr Allah then y do u find it hard to blieve that He couldn't make Jesus speak just after birth

besides, if Adam can b born without a father then y not Jesus?

Because its a story that the names changed through out history....Same stories, but different names.

Originally posted by maham
i m not worried abt that either lol

it's Loralai cuz my dads in army so v hav to move frm place to place after every 2 or 3 yrs ,but i actually belong to Lahore

i feal sorry for u.

I moved a lot too..... 🙁

Do you feel sorry for me????

not really, u dont live in loralai, lol. its not exactly the greatest of places to live in.

Re: Who Was The Father Of Jesus?

Originally posted by leonheartmm
this topic is highly contraversial even from the christian point of view, i wanted to make people's belief's a little clearer. did jesus have a father? did god{or the holy spirit} impregnate mary physically or was it done just because he willed it? is the father of jesus GOD or is JESUS god? jesus was known to be a human being, would that mean that he had god's DNA? and since he was part mary and part god? does jesus LOOK like god?{physical similarities} i wanna hear out what people have got to say on the subject.

From my religions point of view God has a body, just like all of us. The Holy Ghost, Christ and God are 3 separate beings...however the Holy Ghost is the only one without a body.

We are all made in Gods image so we all have similarities with God.

I don't know for sure whether or not Christ has God's DNA, but that wouldn't seem impossible to me (I can't speak for the church on that one).

Mary wasn't physically impregnated, she was impregnated thorough the spirit I believe (i'm 99% sure that's what they church believes atleast).

That's what my churchs point of view on the matter is!

but if she wasnt physically impregnated, why was jesus not 50% spiritual in place of being 100% physical. i mean if he was physical then he MUST have had god's dna in him. n mary MUST have been physically impregnated.

Kinda like doing it with the air......and coming up with something solid.............Though there is this one crack pot who said he found the Ark of the Covenant which underneath the crucification site, and when the earthquake hit Jesus blood dripped down on the Ark...He said he took some sample of the old dried blood and it was missing a chromosome..

Originally posted by debbiejo
Kinda like doing it with the air......and coming up with something solid.............Though there is this one crack pot who said he found the Ark of the Covenant which underneath the crucification site, and when the earthquake hit Jesus blood dripped down on the Ark...He said he took some sample of the old dried blood and it was missing a chromosome..
Yeah right

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Yeah right

http://www.wyattmuseum.com/ark-of-the-covenant-02.htm

If it was true, you'd think it would of made the papers.....

i dont get why god would deny his bride{so to speak} the pleasure of sex anyway.

Originally posted by debbiejo
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/ark-of-the-covenant-02.htm

If it was true, you'd think it would of made the papers.....

Not really being published doesn't mean it's not true I just have my doubts unless he has irrefutable evidence.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Not really being published doesn't mean it's not true I just have my doubts unless he has irrefutable evidence.
Well, if it's true, then that would mean that Jesus is part god...But how can people be missing a chromosome and still be normal..perfect and sinless.

normally people missing a chromosome are RETARTED {downs syndrome being one of many results}

i think that account is bullshit though.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
normally people missing a chromosome are RETARTED {downs syndrome being one of many results}

i think that account is bullshit though.

Agreed

Originally posted by leonheartmm
normally people missing a chromosome are RETARTED {downs syndrome being one of many results}

i think that account is bullshit though.

However, that is not always the way that nature works. If downs syndrome had a distinct advantage over intelligence, then downs syndrome people would prosper and intelligent people would die off. This is an extreme example, but my point is that what we value may not be what is best for survival.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
i dont get why god would deny his bride{so to speak} the pleasure of sex anyway.

He didn't, though. She married Joseph, didn't she. [Unless of course you're Catholic, in which case you believe Mary stayed a virgin the rest of her life... but that's another can of worms.]

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Agreed
Also like I said, Jesus was to be perfect and if he was missing a chromosome then he wasn't perfect and would not be an acceptable sacrifice.