Originally posted by office jesus
I'm kind of puzzled by this thread. It hasn't affected anything. It's just another shitty romance movie. Like we need another one of THOSE. At least it wasn't another romantic comedy.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Quote me the scripture where it says no oral sex.(when you assume, you make an A-S-S out of U and M-E)
the bible gives stories which clearly imply that a mans seed is meant for reproduction, and that it angers god to see his seed wasted. (im so tempted to sing 'every sperm is sacred'😉
here, i did a quick search:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/masturba3.htm
Originally posted by PVS
the bible gives stories which clearly imply that a mans seed is meant for reproduction, and that it angers god to see his seed wasted. (im so tempted to sing 'every sperm is sacred'😉
here, i did a quick search:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/masturba3.htm
Right you are sir, it does give that parable about not wasting seed, which is open to interpretation.
Many over the years have said that it meant no masturbation, but it could just as well be meant to say that you shouldn't be careless with the gifts and talents that God has given you, or to work hard and not waste time, etc.....
But there is no specific place where it says "straights cannot have oral sex." as it says "men should not lay with other men ." (or women for that matter.)
So trying to say that gay sex is natural or in line with God's word is silly, just as much so as trying to point out a heterosexual practice, that even IF named directly in the Bible would still have absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that penises fit into naturally lubed vaginas and deliver sperm to ovaries to make life, whilst gay sex is for want.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Right you are sir, it does give that parable about not wasting seed, which is open to interpretation.
Convienient. I bet people loved blow jobs back in those days too.
And how old is that ass-u-me line? Holy crap, it's 2006 bro, show some originality.
Oops, forgot, you're Christian. Possibly the least original people on earth.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Good non-response to the point.I commend you.
Ive responded to Bible humping many times. I'm getting kind of tired of hearing "Well this part of the Bible is open to interpretation, and this isn't. NO look, the Old Testament doesn't count anymore. I don't care if Jesus said he didn't come to abolish the old laws, he did it anyway. It doesn't matter if the Old Testament doesn't count anymore, we'll read and quote it anyway when it suits us. NO! SHUT UP! JESUSJESUSJESUS! YOU UNSAVED HEATHEN! I WILL PRAY FOR YOUR SOUL! GAYS ARE THE SPAWN OF SATAN!!!"
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Right you are sir, it does give that parable about not wasting seed, which is open to interpretation.Many over the years have said that it meant no masturbation, but it could just as well be meant to say that you shouldn't be careless with the gifts and talents that God has given you, or to work hard and not waste time, etc.....
But there is no specific place where it says "straights cannot have oral sex." as it says "men should not lay with other men ." (or women for that matter.)
So trying to say that gay sex is natural or in line with God's word is silly, just as much so as trying to point out a heterosexual practice, that even IF named directly in the Bible would still have absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that penises fit into naturally lubed vaginas and deliver sperm to ovaries to make life, whilst gay sex is for want.
thats wonderful. only the current interpretation is that wasting one's seed is a sin. thus the outrage over birth control all the way up to the vatacan. or perhaps you are lost diciple and have the power to interpret the bible as you see fit? (so long as it is convenient and supportive of your homophobia?)
if you waste your seed you are committing a sin. like it or not, thats the deal.
Originally posted by sithsaber408
Good non-response to the point.I commend you.
Originally posted by FeceMan
The parables are all for interpretation.What do you think Christ meant when he said that he gave his disciples "the keys to the kingdom"?
The keys to the kingdom come with certainty over extrapolation.
How biblical
Originally posted by sithsaber408
But there is no specific place where it says "straights cannot have oral sex."
nor is there a place where it says that gay people can not exist, unless they intend to carry the ark of the covenant. The priests are one thing, the masses are another. You fail to recognize that.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
nor is there a place where it says that gay people can not exist, unless they intend to carry the ark of the covenant. The priests are one thing, the masses are another. You fail to recognize that.
I agree completely. Most Catholic Priests are gay anyway.
As a gay male myself, I frankly feel the movie is a bit satirical of the gay lifestyle. Quite frankly, teh intricacies that homosexuality consists of is more than just sex.
I also find it rather offensive that both gay males were portrayed as cowboys. Is it possible to have a homosexual male, represented in a role, that doesn't fit into some sort of stereotypical mold?
Originally posted by teh smart guy
I also find it rather offensive that both gay males were portrayed as cowboys. Is it possible to have a homosexual male, represented in a role, that doesn't fit into some sort of stereotypical mold?
Well, I suppose a movie about gay cowboys should probably have some sor of...well...gay cowboys.