A critical analysis of the Oscars

Started by meep-meep2 pages

A critical analysis of the Oscars

What are the Oscars? I think it is a fiasco where priveleged celebrities get together and flaunt their expensive clothes and personalities for anybody willing to watch. The insane thing is people do.

The event itself costs more than 4 big budget movies to arrange. All that so millionaire actresses, actors media and hollywood pundits and other martini drinking bottom feeding types get to throw an expensive party. Sounds like a perfectly socially progressive and aware thing to do, right? If you can't tell I'm being sarcastic.

Dresses that cost tens of thousands of dollars. Unbelievable. And what is the purpose of pointing out the ridiculously inattainable hollywood criteria for beauty at this event? These women are just their to be looked at. Does this high-class social event further women's liberation? No the women aren't hushed but they aren't exactly talking about anything important. Also, I think pratically all the directors are men.

You go to a bar and the people who aren't important enough to be there watch it on a big screen tv. They laugh and appreciate all the witty commentary and jokes that the Oscars have to offer. They drink their drinks and feel important. They feel apart of the American elite, at least for a night. After it's over the working class go back to their real lives and real social status. They are left with that taste of high class life. But why do these working class people, tall and short, fat and thin, pretentious and vulgar enjoy this charade? It gives them that hope that life is indeed fair. There's no reason to complain, just joke. Let's joke about George Bush and Cheney shootiing a guy. Let's not talk about the war. Let's not, at least, give a moment or silence for the people who died in the multiple natural disasters around the planet. Nah, let's just laugh and feel good about ourselves. There's no reason to think life is unfair. If an ugly guy like John Stewart can make it, surely I can.

This brings me to John Stewart. The self-implied liberal-on-the-side-of-the-american-people comedian. I couldn't believe when he started to preach about the wrongness of piracy. That surely had nothing to with the fact he was surrounded by thousands of people in the movie industry. John Stewart just reinforced what he really was at the Oscars. A comedian who does what he has to do to get paid. What respect I did have for him is probably gone, after seeinig him act like a complete lacky. He could have done so much in that position. LIke I mentioned before he could have at least had moment of silence. Nope. No siree. Piracy is definitely a rung higher on the to fix list than helping people in need. John Stewart. He is stuck in the pocket of whoever has enough money to buy him.

On a side note. The montage of those old western films that implied homosexuality in old films was pretty damn funny. I doubt J. Stew had anything to do with that, though.

Back to the women. Why are they not celebrated by the fact they are women and not because they have the most trendy gown? There a restrictive criteria in Hollywood when it comes to the status of women there.

And George Clooney. He gave his speech. It was nice. It made him and every other person in show biz feel all warm and inportant inside, I bet. It made them feel like they give so much to society. They are model citizens. There's that sarcasm again. In truth Clooney is probably a decent, semi-socially conscious man. The problem is he is a millionaire and disconnected form society as he pointed out. His interpretation of Hollywoods disconnection form society, and how it affected the rest of the working class people iin the U.S. was a bit different than mine, though.

He mentioned they were sometimes disconnected from us but it was a good thing becausae they could see things we couldn't. Because of this they can show us and lead us in the right direction. Being disconnected from ignorance isn't a good thing mister Clooney.Understanding ignorance is more important. If you really want to help how about you uild a school in east L.A. and visit the children there every week, and give honor roll students to you next movie. How about donating some money to scholorships. That might be a little more effective. Don't proclaim that you and other people like you are our saviors. You are privileged, we aren't how about addressing those issues. Implying that we aren't smart enough to lead and think for ourselves is a little insulting, actually. We can percieve injustice too you know.In fact we can probably perceive it better than some one in your position can. I know we can. And if you want to help maybe you could start by openning the public to "prestigious" events like the Oscars. It might allow you to be more connected the people you claim to help.

I'm done.

It's a waste, but entertainment for the simple public.

Not everything in this world has to be done for some high and almighty purpose.

The Academy Awards are fun.

And you know that Actors/Men attend to right?

You never hear people referring to The Super Bowl in this way.

is it comprehensible.....

Oscars are overrated....

...the awards...not the people name Oscar.

Jon Stewart wasn't preaching about the wrongness of piracy. He made a joke, if anything, making light of piracy by implying that stealing from these rich people is a victimless crime because they already have too much.

The super bowl isn't exactly the same sort of event, but that doesn't mean something mieaningful can't be addressed their, as well.

The Academy awards are fun. Ok. But my point is that it's stupid.

I believe I addressed men too.

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
Not everything in this world has to be done for some high and almighty purpose.

The Academy Awards are fun.

And you know that Actors/Men attend to right?

You never hear people referring to The Super Bowl in this way.

is it comprehensible.....

I think to superbowls stupid too..........But then that's me..

Originally posted by BackFire
Jon Stewart wasn't preaching about the wrongness of piracy. He made a joke, if anything, making light of piracy by implying that stealing from these rich people is a victimless crime because they already have too much.

Maybe I was a little to harsh on the piracy thing....I know Stewart likes to crack jokes in a subtle way and maybe in my attempt to crtitic everything I saw I conviently ignored his subtle comedy.

Originally posted by debbiejo
I think to superbowls stupid too..........But then that's me..

Yeah. The SB is pretty dumb too. People watch it for commericials fer chrissake.

And there in lies the problem, you were too eager to critique the Oscars that you yourself seemed to become a bit bias. The oscars are simply an award show meant to entertain and recognize good films.

Originally posted by debbiejo
I think to superbowls stupid too..........But then that's me..

Bite your tongue!

Originally posted by meep-meep
The super bowl isn't exactly the same sort of event, but that doesn't mean something mieaningful can't be addressed their, as well.

The Academy awards are fun. Ok. But my point is that it's stupid.

I believe I addressed men too.

yeah, I can see how the super bowl isn't really the same thing.

People just come together to watch people throw a ball around and tackle others, sometimes getting seriously injured.

The Academy Awards is sooo awful though. People come together and accept awards for things that they've worked hard to do in a formal fashion.

There is a difference. But not in the way you say.

is it comprehensible.....

Most awards shows today mean nothing at all.

Awards are given to anyone for anything.

-AC

I give AC the award for best post in this thread.

*gives award*

😂

Good one.

This is all so unexpected, really.

*Unreels list*

Firstly I would like to thank Satan...

-AC

I watch the awards, but don't see the sense in them, really. I can;t believe celebs wear dresses worth thouasands, then just discard them when they are done with them, and never wear them again.

Plus, most of the people who get nominated are crap, as well as their movies.

Reese Witherspoon best actress? You can't be serious, the girl looks about 19 and is as ugly as all hell. IMO.

I never watch them.

I used to, same with the Grammies, but they suck now, so I just see who wins before the show actually airs.

Haven't seen the awards yet, taped them accidentaly anything fun worth watching?. Like that one time when Robin Williams did that South Park song (think it was him and think it was the academy awards)