Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
exactly, you're seeing the absurdity. No one is ever going to sell a style of underware called "panties for men". And if they exist, it's a joke directed at gay men.
Express is a store for alot of gay men. Lets just face the facts. Even though I shop there (im straight) I still always see gay men shopping there and almost every guy I see working there is gay.
Originally posted by brainchild81
But you don't know what you're talking about. You're making assumptions.
Oh yes, I am. I'm making assumptions about your opinion and what drives it...however:
Originally posted by Punker69
Express is a store for alot of gay men. Lets just face the facts. Even though I shop there (im straight) I still always see gay men shopping there and almost every guy I see working there is gay.
Is a pretty good reason to assume your motivation in saying that you won't shop there because it's called Express FOR MEN
Just for a bit of behind the scenes info, here's a link I found
Originally posted by Capt_FantasticQuoting what somebody else said doesn't prove anything. I really don't know whether gays shop there or not because the moment they changed the name, I stopped going. You're being a rude gay guy now. Stop it.
Oh yes, I am. I'm making assumptions about your opinion and what drives it...however:Is a pretty good reason to assume your motivation in saying that you won't shop there because it's called Express FOR MEN
Originally posted by Darth Jello
Just out of curiosity, is a "gaydar" just a fancy term for an erection?
No, gaydar is a term for an instinct that provides the person who has it with an innate sense of the sexual orientation of an observed individual. (Whob, you can use this as a "definition" later on in one of your arguments if you'd like)
That being said, tons of gay men shop at Express...however my point from the beginning has been that not only gay men shop at Express. ....for men.
Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
No, gaydar is a term for an instinct that provides the person who has it with an innate sense of the sexual orientation of an observed individual. (Whob, you can use this as a "definition" later on in one of your arguments if you'd like)