Devil May Cry 4

Started by Pulse211 pages

Hate shooters -_- I played DMC2, it was okay, but nothing I haven't "endured" before, more showing of, more aiming and fire, doesnt matter what you do with shooters, they'll always be the same. I'm not too bothered about the recent news to be honest, happy for 360 fans, hope they enjoy it, cos I know I wouldn't no matter what console it appeared on.

Originally posted by Pulse2
Hate shooters -_- I played DMC2, it was okay, but nothing I haven't "endured" before, more showing of, more aiming and fire, doesnt matter what you do with shooters, they'll always be the same. I'm not too bothered about the recent news to be honest, happy for 360 fans, hope they enjoy it, cos I know I wouldn't no matter what console it appeared on.

DMC2 is the worst of the series, you got a bit unlucky there, DMC1 and 3 might change your mind.

Originally posted by Pulse2
Hate shooters -_- I played DMC2, it was okay, but nothing I haven't "endured" before, more showing of, more aiming and fire, doesnt matter what you do with shooters, they'll always be the same. I'm not too bothered about the recent news to be honest, happy for 360 fans, hope they enjoy it, cos I know I wouldn't no matter what console it appeared on.

Its die-hard fans will want me hung for this, but they lack the ability to perceive correctly, so it's ok;

That is exactly what it is. Run around in rendered environments, with default unlimited ammo, whilst making a man do fancy tricks by pressing buttons fast. It makes people who are shit at games feel like they're good at games.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Its die-hard fans will want me hung for this, but they lack the ability to perceive correctly, so it's ok;

That is exactly what it is. Run around in rendered environments, with default unlimited ammo, whilst making a man do fancy tricks by pressing buttons fast. It makes people who are shit at games feel like they're good at games.

-AC


People who are shit at games usually quit playing DMC because it's too hard for them.

Originally posted by Validus
People who are shit at games usually quit playing DMC because it's too hard for them.

I find that strange, as I've played through the first DMC game and it's one of the easiest games I've ever played. I know people who normally suck at games who found it easy.

True , I know alot of people said DMC3 was apparently 'Insanely Difficult' yet I trounced both easy , normal and hard relatively quickly.

Originally posted by Validus
People who are shit at games usually quit playing DMC because it's too hard for them.

BS.

It's possib....no, wait. Just BS.

Originally posted by grey fox
True , I know alot of people said DMC3 was apparently 'Insanely Difficult' yet I trounced both easy , normal and hard relatively quickly.

The main knock on DMC3 on most gaming websites was its difficulty. The special edition re-release actually toned down the difficulty greatly.

Originally posted by Lana
I find that strange, as I've played through the first DMC game and it's one of the easiest games I've ever played. I know people who normally suck at games who found it easy.

A lot of my friends who play video games a lot never made it past the Cerberus boss.

Originally posted by Validus
The main knock on DMC3 on most gaming websites was its difficulty. The special edition re-release actually toned down the difficulty greatly.

A lot of my friends who play video games a lot never made it past the Cerberus boss.

In hard mode in the original version, I had problems with Agni and Ruda. Your right in that the special addition was extremely toned down. After beating it in the original game, the special addition was a breeze.

Cerberus is relatively easy.

Agni and Rudra are difficult because it's basically double teaming you , but if your smart enough to notice the elemental weakness you can trounce them easy.

Nevan is who most people stop at from what I understand.

She's insanely easy with Vergil though.

I've noticed some time ago of the hate towards PS3. First it was the 360 beating the PS3 because it had better graphics. Then it was the wii beating the PS3 because it made better sales. Wtf? People who say that obviously contradict themselves. Saying the 360 is better than the PS3 because of better graphics (which I'm not entirely sure of yet) basing it just on that and then saying the wii is better than PS3 because it made better sales is bull. By that logic PS3's graphics >>> Wii's. If you want to talk sales, 360 >>>> Wii. But people go by specific things in certain situations to fit their biased standards.

That has absolutely nothing to do with the topic and I already told everyone to stop with the off-topic chatter.

Well it started when one person said "DMC4 is coming to the 360 so why buy a dumb PS3?" Then the PS3 flaming started.

The PS3/360 discussion has something to do with the topic because DMC4 is coming out on both.

Number one, no, it really doesn't, and number two, that conversation was ended already because I said for the arguing about it to drop.

If someone talks about DMC4 possibly having better graphics on the 360 than on the PS3, it's still being on topic, because it talks about DMC4 and it happens to include PS3 and 360 into the discussion.

And if something said something like that, then it's on-topic. However, arguing over which console is better is NOT on topic and is what I said I wanted to not see anymore of in this thread.

I found nightmare on DMC1 IMO the hardest boss I've ever fought, seriously when he's in his vulnerable state he's still attacking you. DMC3 original version wasn't that hard to be honest, quite a breeze.

I don't any system is "better." It's more about what each company offers me, as a consumer.

Sony is hurting the PS3 right now by not offering something different in terms of gaming. At this point, the 360 is more versatile in terms of games out and in devolpment, and Sony has lost a few exclusives making people freak out. I see PS3 Home as a gimmick and wouldn't use it much if I had a PS3.

I still like MGS4, FFXIII, and free online. Other than that, I see nothing that I like personally that says I should pay at least $100 more for a console.

Originally posted by chithappens
I don't any system is "better." It's more about what each company offers me, as a consumer.

Sony is hurting the PS3 right now by not offering something different in terms of gaming. At this point, the 360 is more versatile in terms of games out and in devolpment, and Sony has lost a few exclusives making people freak out. I see PS3 Home as a gimmick and wouldn't use it much if I had a PS3.

I still like MGS4, FFXIII, and free online. Other than that, I see nothing that I like personally that says I should pay at least $100 more for a console.

That has absolutely nothing to do with DMC4. Stuff like that goes in the Next-Gen thread that's stickied at the top of the forum.

*i think i may have been the one to say dmc was on 360*