Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Nope, I'm not going to consider a candidate "legitimate" unless she gave you head already...in an off election year.
I can't disagree with this line of thinking. In fact, I'm embarrased that I didn't think of it.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Gives a new meaning to 'Head Of State'. Bada-bing!
*High Five* ZING! Be proud of that one.
Re: Re: Re: Laura Bush: U.S. ready for a woman president
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
They'd seem likely to succeed.
Oh, shit! I missed that. I had to say it a few times before I got it though. Good stuff.
My quip was more of one for the masses, whereas yours needed some thought, not to mention phonetic manipulation (although I just did...).
Thanks for my high-five, Backfire. It made me feel warm and delicate like a cloud (a warm one).
I vote for whoever I think deserves to be voted for, based on several factors.
#1: Who seems smarter and stronger. (Stronger personality wise.)
#2: Who is more passionate. (Passion fuels The Force.)
And #3: The one who can actually tell the truth SOMEWHAT. (Comeon, Kerry claims to be Catholic but is pro-choice? I havn't heard a lie that obvious and offenssive sense Nixon claimed to not be anti-semetic..)
But Laura? No way, she's nice and all, (Kindof hot to..) but she doesn't exactly scream president matireal.. Infact, none of the women the media keeps trying to convince should try and run do, not even Condeleeza Rice, sure she may be smart and a good stradegist, but she seems more like someone by your side instead of giving orders. She's the Martian Manhunter in the Bush administration's JLU.. Sure things would fall apart without her, but she doesn't REALLY call the shots..
I'd nominate Ronald Regan before Laura..
Yes, I know he's dead..