Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I disagree. You must not know many scientists.
I know of none! I merely read their books.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Walk you through it?
Yes, is such a charge ridiculous to you?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What are you asking me?
To present your case -- present evidence!
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I have one problem with the idea of creation, and that is the idea is too simple and finite. The question of creation leads to silly questions like "what came before?", and "why?.
Such is the nature of scientific "inquiry." That bothers you?!!
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The book Flatland by Edwin A. Abbott sits on my desk in a prominent location. It was the start of my personal journey. Have you read it?
No.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
If you took flatland and curved into a ball, and then expand this ball, the flatlanders would be surprised to see new land come from nothingness.
With all due respect, so what! Where did the "flatland" come from? And what caused the flatland to "curve into a ball and then expand"? And who in the world are the "flatlanders"?! Explain!
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You see, the big bang was a bubble in a ten dimensional universe.
Okay... provide an explanation -- evidence! Talk to me, please. Attach an explanation with your statements. Again, I'm not trying to sharp shoot you. You simply must explain your position. This goes without saying!
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There was no creation, just an expanding bubble in the multiverse.
Where did the "expanding bubble" come from? Brother... again, I'm not trying to sharp shoot you. I would love to engage in debate/conversation with you. I'd like to understand your views; but with statements like these, I simply cannot. Your not communicating yourself. Communicate, already!