Yoda runs the Gauntlet

Kun has shown nothing more impressive then Yoda in terms of force power without the amulet. And do you have any proof that Kun would outduel Kun in a saber duel. Lucas states that the PT era is the golden age of saber fighting. Yoda is arguably the best duelist of the PT era.

Originally posted by zod360
Kun has shown nothing more impressive then Yoda in terms of force power without the amulet. And do you have any proof that Kun would outduel Kun in a saber duel. Lucas states that the PT era is the golden age of saber fighting. Yoda is arguably the best duelist of the PT era.

Golden age of sabercombat compared to the OT. Unless you can provide a link where he says its the golden age of saber combat. point. end of sentence no further context given. Then you have a point otherwise you don't.

Numan, the Golden Age of the Jedi differs from the Golden Age of the Sith.

Sith consider their peak when they have their strongest warriors and their strongest force users

Jedi consider their peak, when they achieve their ideal of universal peace, which they accomplished during the PT era.

Numan before you go and degrade characters of immense power, learn EU, learn to debate and finally learn to use logic. Illogical reasoning and Bias is not logic.

Ok, Numan, accordingly if Kun's Blasts can be blocked, provide evidence it wouldn't for Luke's emerald lightning, degrading one's skill means the degrading of another is just as logic.

We have no proof if the blasts can be blocked by a saber, likewise we have no proof that the emerald lightning can be blocked by a saber, hence debating such a pointless point is stupid.

Numan, apart from giving your personal opinion and illogical reasoning, what else can you do?

Originally posted by w00t2112
Numan, the Golden Age of the Jedi differs from the Golden Age of the Sith.

Sith consider their peak when they have their strongest warriors and their strongest force users

Jedi consider their peak, when they achieve their ideal of universal peace, which they accomplished during the PT era.

Numan before you go and degrade characters of immense power, learn EU, learn to debate and finally learn to use logic. Illogical reasoning and Bias is not logic.

And you need to learn some reading comprehension skills. Lucas stated that the PT era was the golden age of lightsaber dueling, not the golden age of the jedi. Like I said, you need to learn some reading comprehension skills.

Originally posted by w00t2112
Ok, Numan, accordingly if Kun's Blasts can be blocked, provide evidence it wouldn't for Luke's emerald lightning, degrading one's skill means the degrading of another is just as logic.

We have no proof if the blasts can be blocked by a saber, likewise we have no proof that the emerald lightning can be blocked by a saber, hence debating such a pointless point is stupid.

Numan, apart from giving your personal opinion and illogical reasoning, what else can you do?

Sorry but what the **** are you talking about? Why are you bringing up Luke and his lightning because I certainly am not. Maybe if you learnt to read, you would see that it says "Yoda runs the gauntlet" and not Luke. And we have never seen the blast up against a saber, but that doesn't mean that you can assume that the blast is unstoppable and therefor Kun would own Yoda. Oh, and nextime you finish with a smartass comment, make sure what you have already said makes sense you big dummy. It is clear from your last two posts that you have completely missed the point of everything that I have said.

Originally posted by zod360
And you need to learn some reading comprehension skills. Lucas stated that the PT era was the golden age of lightsaber dueling, not the golden age of the jedi. Like I said, you need to learn some reading comprehension skills.

and you need to respond to my post. Golden age of lightsaber fighting compared to the OT, he said what he said when talking about the difference in sabercombat between the two movies, he doesn't say its the best age of lightsaber fighting eva.

That's not what he said. He said THE golden age of saber dueling.

The golden age of Swordsmanship was quite likely the Era of Tulak Hord. In KOTOR II, on Korriban, Kriea says that Tulak Hord was considered to be the most remarkable Sith lightsaber duelist, even in his time, when many true lightsaber duelist duelist lived.

Originally posted by zod360
That's not what he said. He said THE golden age of saber dueling.

Have a link or a quote about that? With the sentence he said before and after that particulair sentence?

Originally posted by zod360
That's not what he said. He said THE golden age of saber dueling.

And Lucas also said that EU is another universe that he doesn't touch. And I do actually have the quote, unlike you.

In short, there's nothing that can be applied definitively throughout the ENTIRE CONTINUUM of EU.

You need to learn reading comprehension and debating ability. While you're at it, it'd be smart to try to get a new brain.

Originally posted by Xepeyon
The golden age of Swordsmanship was quite likely the Era of Tulak Hord. In KOTOR II, on Korriban, Kriea says that Tulak Hord was considered to be the most remarkable Sith lightsaber duelist, even in his time, when many true lightsaber duelist duelist lived.

Perhaps, but Numan you argue so pointless, that my mind is affected by your clear stupidity, Your the one who needs comprehension skills, and you cant argue for sh*t.

If GL doesn't give a damn about EU, his quotes cannot be applied into EU, learn to accept the fact that your fanboyism will not work, nor your illogical reasoning,

Yea contradicting GL=bad.

Lots of things that are EU such as video games are made by Lucas Arts. So George Lucas obviously passes what is made by Lucas Entertainment or Lucas Arts.