Jedi (Light) VS. Sith(Dark)

I didn't bring it up our master debater did.. Then he proceeded to dodge the questions with his dictionary.. Amazing debater..

Originally posted by tdtd
I didn't bring it up our master debater did.. Then he proceeded to dodge the questions with his dictionary.. Amazing debater..

Ad hominem.

Hasty generalization.

Begging the question.

Straw man.

Four logical fallacies in just under two real sentences.

I refer you to Faunus' quote. It's still applicable.

Stop using the dictionary so much, stop dodging the question, and stop agreeing with the only person that gave you a compliment, all because you can't take the time to formulate another argument. You seem to have no problem copying the dictionary though, in all that time you could have formed an argument. Again thanks for proving my point IKC..

Stop using the dictionary so much,

Not sure it's a logical fallacy, but complaining about me pointing out your logical fallacies sure is hilarious.

stop dodging the question

Straw man.

Begging the question

and stop agreeing with the only person that gave you a compliment

A poorly-disguised attempt at:

Appeal to Majority (ad populum) - Appeal to perceived popular prejudices and ideas to prove an argument.

all because you can't take the time to formulate another argument

The hasty generalization.

Straw man.

You seem to have no problem copying the dictionary though

Begging the question

Straw man

Ad hominem?

in all that time you could have formed an argument

Begging the question.

Straw man.

Again thanks for proving my point IKC..

Begging the question.

The hasty generalization.

About 12 logical fallacies in just three sentences.

Still lying to yourself because you can't formulate an argument in all that time you took to copy the dictionary?

Originally posted by tdtd
Still lying to yourself because you can't formulate an argument in all that time you took to copy the dictionary?

Ad hominem.

Hasty generalization.

Straw man.

Begging the question.

You're averaging about 4 logical fallacies per post, not counting that whopper.

Originally posted by tdtd
Still lying to yourself because you can't formulate an argument in all that time you took to copy the dictionary?

Continue dodging a debate..

Originally posted by tdtd
Continue dodging a debate..

Hasty generalization

Begging the question

Straw man

Originally posted by tdtd
Still lying to yourself because you can't formulate an argument in all that time you took to copy the dictionary?

Denial

Originally posted by tdtd
Denial

Ad hominem

Straw man

Begging the question

Wow, you managed three with just one word.

Refer to my previous posts since you can't comprehend the difference between an accurate statement and a personal attack, before continuing to use the dictionary for your posts

Err this forum has become...IKC vs tdtd

You're still committing:

Hasty generalization

Straw man

Begging the question

And youre still dodging the debate while I offer proof for my "claim". Nice..

Originally posted by w00t2112
Err this forum has become...IKC vs tdtd

It's more like tdtd vs. his penchant for committing logical fallacies and his ability to keep posting them.

It's the Emperor's New Clothes all over again.

Originally posted by tdtd
And youre still dodging the debate while I offer proof for my "claim". Nice..

Straw man

Hasty generalization

Begging the question (x2)

Originally posted by IKC
It's more like tdtd vs. his penchant for committing logical fallacies and his ability to keep posting them.

It's the Emperor's New Clothes all over again.

I'd say it's more like IKC's inability to form an argument, while his defense consists of vocabulary terms he doesn't understand.. It's a treat to read though.

to read his posts or your arguments?

Originally posted by tdtd
I'd say it's more like IKC's inability to form an argument, while his defense consists of vocabulary terms he doesn't understand.. It's a treat to read though.

Ad hominem(x2)

Appeal to ridicule - The Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an "argument." This line of "reasoning" has the following form:

1. X, which is some form of ridicule is presented (typically directed at the claim).
2. Therefore claim C is false.

Hasty generalization

Straw man

Begging the question

Ok so just say youre in denial and youre using definitions that don't even apply to this argument. Now either stop embarassing yourself and formulate and argument that you could have done hours ago, or keep up the good laugh.