Exar Kun Vs Serra Keto, General Grievous, and Darth Maul

Sabers only. No Force!

So this is Exar Kun versus "let's pile people on until he finally dies?"

You didn't even pile on some very good people. Grievous is the biggest threat of the trio.

*Sigh*Here we go....

Yeah, the caliber of enemies here really blows. Keto and Maul would hardly last very long against him.

This a serious thread? Does Kun even have to get up for this?

Why would Kun waste his time with this?

tdtd, this thread was dying. It's a bad thread. Let it die. Don't bump bad threads.

Originally posted by Generic Hero
Why would Kun waste his time with this?

Originally posted by IKC
So this is Exar Kun versus "let's pile people on until he finally dies?"

You didn't even pile on some very good people. Grievous is the biggest threat of the trio.

Originally posted by Illustrious
Yeah, the caliber of enemies here really blows. Keto and Maul would hardly last very long against him.

Exar casually. 👆

...................................

Uh, actually I'll go with the trio! Exar only has one weapon, that's an awful lot to block, and Maul's not exactly a slouch, Grievous is good backup, and Serra, while not as good as those, is still quite a good duelist who only needs to fill the third slot.

Force is the best way to handle people of a level or so down quickly, without force he can't focus on anyone singly, and with split concentration it'll be hard to take anyone down.

Grievous or Maul could potentially solo. or at least stalemate; both of them together would come close to stomping Exar.

The way I see it, there's some analogy to the Savage/Maul vs Sidious fight.

Griev is more skilled than Savage in saber (though Sav did have brute force going for him, plus, well, the force). Savage + Maul were, purely in the saber portion, doing reasonably well against Sidious (Sidious only was on the offense either with force, or by isolating the two and going solo on sabers), holding their own at least. Serra's someone good enough to give Anakin a bit of a fight. And Sidious is better than Exar.

Without force bolts to lessen the odds, or force push to separate his foes, Exar will pretty much have to be on the defensive constantly. Three foes gives very little room to attack, and he can't do a *big* attack without the other two taking advantage. Heck, him sticking a saber in one of them at the expense of getting a wound means he's as good as dead against the remaining two.

This fight is nothing at all like Sidious vs Maul and Savage.

Originally posted by ILS
This fight is nothing at all like Sidious vs Maul and Savage.

It's one person vs multiple weaker ones.

Except the one side is weaker, the multiple side is stronger, and there's no force to do the tricks that Sids did to win.

Well, I don't see Exar as undoubtedly stronger in sabers than Grievous or Maul. Arguably he's their equal, more or less. But to each their own. *shrugs*

Yeah, without the force Kun is getting reamed.

Jesus, this thread is a throw-back to ignorant ass times lol. Let the '05/'06 era die pls.

Never.

🙁

Originally posted by ILS
Well, I don't see Exar as undoubtedly stronger in sabers than Grievous or Maul. Arguably he's their equal, more or less. But to each their own. *shrugs*

He's the best sith of his time and known specifically for being really really good at sabers. He should be at least somewhat better than Maul, who in turn is better than Grievous.

*implying Maul and Grievous aren't also accredited with being "really good" at sabers*

I'm interested in hearing your actual case for Exar being better. What showings/accolades do you believe surpass what Maul has?