Progressive rock

Started by BackFire2 pages

Dredg falls under the definition of progressive music/rock from what I understand. It's a term that's been used to describe them by numerous music reviewers and critics since before the Leitmotif album. It's even a term that was used by them to describe their music a while back on their old old webpage, which has since changed and no longer has information about their style. So you can take my word on that if you like, or not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_music

One way the term has been applied is to subgenres that have evolved from their root genre by innovating, either through incorporating instruments from other genres or using new techniques within the framework provided by the instrumentation of the root genre to make a new or crossover style. Another is in reference to a gradual build-up of energy within progressive music track or throughout an album.

They do both of those.

In rock, the word usually describes music that expands traditional musical structures by adopting influences of jazz, symphonic, folk and world music. Progressive rock artists often string together the songs so that the entire album will become an uninterrupted musical "journey".

And those.

Plus, there's - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dredg which describes them as progressive.

Finally, there's - http://www.purevolume.com/dredg - a site who's link can be found on Dredg's main webpage, on the "listen" section to be exact, which describes them as progressive and experimental. If I'm not mistaken the above site was created by them, well, their section I mean, so they even describe themselves as progressive.

This doesn't change the fact that Dredg aren't a prog band. I could go grab many links that describe Porcupine Tree as prog, but they're not.

Progressive rock is a very specific label and the bands that actually are prog, are nothing like Dredg. Dredg are a rock band, just a rock band. Nothing to do with prog. Leitmotif era, maybe. Certainly not now. El Cielo had a concept but it had no complex rhythm changes or signatures (at least not enough to be called prog) and nothing like the sound. Catch Without Arms and El Cielo are nothing like an "uninterrupted" musical journey. Nor is Leitmotif really.

Yes, King Crimson, E.L.P, P.o.S etc. Those are prog bands. Dredg are not a prog band. Oh, and I wouldn't trust Wikipedia on this. They describe Opeth as a death metal band. They're obviously into silly, thoughtless labelling. Again, I could go find many labels and quotes that do so, but they do not adhere to what a pure death metal band is.

-AC

As a (semi) aside, remember that Wiki is written by anyone who wants to write on it. Their opinion doesn't gain any extra veracity just because they uploaded it to that site.

Prog's alright. Most of it's too pretentious though, and ends up sucking.

I dig me some early Fates Warning, Camel, Enslaved, Control Denied, King Crimson, etc.

isn't prog metal also prog rock?

Metal and rock are just different enough to have their own genres.

Beyond that it's pointless.

-AC

Originally posted by Etrigan
The best prog bands I know are Dream Theater, Liquid Tension Experiment, Rick Wakeman's solo stuff, Yes, Pink Floyd, and King Crimson.
I wouldn't think Pink Floyd is Prog, and if they are...they probably dont think they are

oh, ok...

Dream Theater is amazing. Liquid Tension Experiment is pretty good too.

hmm..