The Integrity of Mist's Ban?

Raz wrote on Nov 4th, 2005 02:46 AM:
Due to the fact that is a private affair, its not something we usually interfere with.

I would, however, recommend you add this person to your ignore list: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/member2.php?action=viewlist&userlist=ignore

^ According to that post above, the Administrator of this website is directly telling me that they are not allowed to interfere with affairs that occur during posts made forward and replied by members of the Killer Movie Community.

I will not mention the name of the Member whom had sent me the PM, but from the PM I have stored in my Inbox, he sends me a message, repulsively swearing in it and insulting me and it ends with a picture of a naked man shoving his middle finger into private regions . . .

I sent a picture of this PM to Raz, and the Administrator replied with the quoted post above.

If they cannot interfere with situations that occur during a PM, then why are they doing it right now?

Why should the rules be bent this time, and stay straight in an occasion similar to this?

Originally posted by BackFire
Mist was banned for constantly sending harrassing PM's to members with horrific sexually deviant content.

^ This is what I understand happened with Mist.

The Member that sent me the PM with the Graphic Image and the consistent cussing was previously warned in the past and Raz states that nothing can be done to him because this was something that happened during Private Messaging, which Mods and even the ADMIN cannot step into.

So, why are the Rules different in this scenario?

Originally posted by BackFire
Mist was banned for constantly sending harrassing PM's to members with horrific sexually deviant content.

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
^ According to that post above, the Administrator of this website is directly telling me that they are not allowed to interfere with affairs that occur during posts made forward and replied by members of the Killer Movie Community.

I will not mention the name of the Member whom had sent me the PM, but from the PM I have stored in my Inbox, he sends me a message, repulsively swearing in it and insulting me and it ends with a picture of a naked man shoving his middle finger into private regions . . .

I sent a picture of this PM to Raz, and the Administrator replied with the quoted post above.

If they cannot interfere with situations that occur during a PM, then why are they doing it right now?

Why should the rules be bent this time, and stay straight in an occasion similar to this?

^ This is what I understand happened with Mist.

The Member that sent me the PM with the Graphic Image and the consistent cussing was previously warned in the past and Raz states that nothing can be done to him because this was something that happened during Private Messaging, which Mods and even the [b]ADMIN cannot step into.

So, why are the Rules different in this scenario? [/B]

Good work making the thread up Sorgo, Kudos 👆

Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
Good work making the thread up Sorgo, Kudos 👆

For sure.

Here is another quote from Ushgarak on that EXACT SAME DAY regarding this Members vulgar PM.

Ushgarak wrote on Nov 4th, 2005 12:20 AM:
The content of PMs are not really my business. Put him on ignore.

disgustLook at the Mods contradicting themselves like real politicians... how cute.

Originally posted by Ronny
disgustLook at the Mods contradicting themselves like real politicians... how cute.

Eh, Not so cute. 😛

Thats why i used the disgust smilie. I'm pissed like a little boys pants.

Originally posted by Ronny
Thats why i used the disgust smilie. I'm pissed like a little boys pants.

I know how angry you are.

It's not that I'm so angry, it's the fact that they completely contradicted themselves, snapping their own rules.

It's retardation.

But I'm still fairly enraged. Mist was a great member.

Darn tootin! I have half the mind to just walk out of here myself.

And its starting to convice the other half of my mind to do the same 😬

I mean, people come on here all the time and post the stupidest SHIT out in the open in threads And all Michael does is give some whore ***** the old one two over a PRIVATE MESSAGE and whippsah hes out? That hardly seems at all fair.

I'm so ****in fumed.

Originally posted by Ronny
Darn tootin! I have half the mind to just walk out of here myself.

And its starting to convice the other half of my mind to do the same 😬

I mean, people come on here all the time and post the stupidest [b]SHIT out in the open in threads And all Michael does is give some whore ***** the old one two over a PRIVATE MESSAGE and whippsah hes out? That hardly seems at all fair.

I'm so ****in fumed. [/B]

Yeah. PM's are supposed to be purposely from private affairs.

Wow. This is amazing. 🙄

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
^ According to that post above, the Administrator of this website is directly telling me that they are not allowed to interfere with affairs that occur during posts made forward and replied by members of the Killer Movie Community.

I will not mention the name of the Member whom had sent me the PM, but from the PM I have stored in my Inbox, he sends me a message, repulsively swearing in it and insulting me and it ends with a picture of a naked man shoving his middle finger into private regions . . .

I sent a picture of this PM to Raz, and the Administrator replied with the quoted post above.

If they cannot interfere with situations that occur during a PM, then why are they doing it right now?

Why should the rules be bent this time, and stay straight in an occasion similar to this?

^ This is what I understand happened with Mist.

The Member that sent me the PM with the Graphic Image and the consistent cussing was previously warned in the past and Raz states that nothing can be done to him because this was something that happened during Private Messaging, which Mods and even the [b]ADMIN cannot step into.

So, why are the Rules different in this scenario? [/B]

Good job!! There busted but we cannot do anything about it.

Its not just about the private affairs though. I mean she PROVOKED him and she was just upset cause she got rejected.

I mean, since when does porn offend a tramp? She only used it against him cause he would heed to her wishes.

This whole situation totally revolutionizes the way people will treat eachother in public forums! animals_bunny2

Who was it?

Originally posted by Ronny
Its not just about the private affairs though. I mean she PROVOKED him and she was just upset cause she got rejected.

I mean, since when does porn offend a tramp? She only used it against him cause he would heed to her wishes.

Even his ban under the circumstance was bullshit as well.

Hell, if the Circumstances even applied seeing as the rules are apparently fallible to certain Moderators.

Anyways, It's damned ridiculous.

Originally posted by NBT x 20
Who was it?

Can you elaborate on that question?

The tramp Ken talked to over insant message and made a thread on.

Originally posted by Ronny
Its not just about the private affairs though. I mean she PROVOKED him and she was just upset cause she got rejected.

I mean, since when does porn offend a tramp? She only used it against him cause he would heed to her wishes.

Originally posted by Lörd Sorgo
Even his ban under the circumstance was bullshit as well.

Hell, if the Circumstances even applied seeing as the rules are apparently fallible to certain Moderators.

Anyways, It's damned ridiculous.

well.. that was the top of the line.. but still. Poop?