The only thing I liked about it was the Riddle little bit. However I do know its not really like the true character that its suppose to be, but it was still little funny. That was the only cool part about it.
Although I must say its a lot better than Batman and Robin. Thats movie I will never watch again.
Hello Mr. Parker: I knew you would be in this thread *smiles*
Originally posted by Mr ParkerHavent I read this before...
uh yeah whatever.at Least in Batman Forever, Val Kilmer looks the role.Yeah pudgy gut,receding hairline half bald,short runt, michael keaton was so terrific for tall,muscular,handsome,full set of hair bruce wayne. what a joke and insult to true batman fans😆
Schumacher at least got someone who had the right physical build and right look which is crucial for the main role.your obviously too new here to realise there have been many people come on here that have said the same thing about him.just take a look of that thread by Leafar you so much felt the need to resurrect that old dead thread of.He says that same exact same thing.Like me,he ranks Kilmer ahead of keaton because he at least had the right build and right look and also enjoyed forever better than the first two because of Kilmer.you also dont seem to be aware that there are thousands that have voiced their disgust over the choice of keaton over the years for that role like me and Leafar have. 🙄 thats why Batman Begins was made because of how people have voiced their disgust over the burton batman movies over the years and the choice of keaton.Also at least Batman forever wasnt ALL about the villains with batman having just a supporting role in it.it was a batman film that was FINALLY all about batman and we actually understood WHY he fought crime and dressed up like a bat.that SHOULD have been in the first film,that was inexcusable for it not to be.and at least kilmers batman wasnt a wuss in a fight and got the crap beat out of him by the jokers goon,and this is a guy who is suppose to be a martail arts expert. give me a break.LOL
and Batman Forever at least had action in it like a batman movie SHOULD have.the first hour and a half of batman 89 they just stood around talking the whole damn time with just a few brief action scenes here and there.thats absurd for a batman film. No, unlike you Burton apologists who refuse to take off the blinders to see how horrible and crappy the burton batman movies are,I at least know when a good batman movie has been made,and batman forever wasnt near as horrible as the first two. also this is coming from a guy who makes ludicrise comments like batman begins- a movie that had tons of action in it is boring,yet batman 89 was exciting obviously is the guy who lacks good taste in movies.touche. 😆 😆