Originally posted by *Indiegirl*knowledge from ownage institution.
yes really, because if it is impossible to own you then that would mean that no one could own you which would mean that you owned.thankfully thats not true but still 😬
That's even in the book "Owning for dummies" or rather, every single ****ing thing on owning.
Yeah Jacope, you really are, impossible to own.
xyz-owns-jacope-nmw
Originally posted by Captain Falcon😆 you know wut i remember, that you pmed me sayin you owen me, how the **** do you own me. You dont actually. You know wut, **** it cuz owning someone should be like this now dayz besides online
knowledge from ownage institution.That's even in the book "Owning for dummies" or rather, every single ****ing thing on owning.
Yeah Jacope, you really are, impossible to own.
xyz-owns-jacope-nmw
thats owning someone or this
or this
and online, you gotta leave a person speachless or prove em wrong. You never did. Im done here, imma go do my Homework, peace out
1
Originally posted by JacopeX
😆 you know wut i remember, that you pmed me sayin you owen me, how the **** do you own me. You dont actually. You know wut, **** it cuz owning someone should be like this now dayz besides onlinethats owning someone or this
or this
and online, you gotta leave a person speachless or prove em wrong. You never did. Im done here, imma go do my Homework, peace out
1
Originally posted by Itzak
I got bored. 😐
Originally posted by JacopeXwow, you've really sunk that low. You don't really understand owning like me or Bloigen or many others. Ownage is a law. I know all about ownage and I got a certificate to prove it on 5th April 06. Your confusing Ownage with Pwnage. A stupid internet term. Ownage exists all around us, and is never different. Ownage, is making a fool out of someone. Without ownage, there'd be no humour. And no-one wants a world without humour.
😆 you know wut i remember, that you pmed me sayin you owen me, how the **** do you own me. You dont actually. You know wut, **** it cuz owning someone should be like this now dayz besides onlinethats owning someone or this
or this
and online, you gotta leave a person speachless or prove em wrong. You never did. Im done here, imma go do my Homework, peace out
1
Originally posted by JacopeX
actually you didnt leave me speachless and i kept on talkin the answer. I wuz never owned by you.
Originally posted by *Indiegirl*✅
look back at those threads. Both times you refused to answer back to my points on the argument, this means that if you do not have anything to say about the argument and you have no comments in your defence then you were owned which in fact did happen, Regardless of whether you changed the subject to distract/avoid letting everyone know you just got owned. 🙂
Originally posted by *Indiegirl*I did defend myself. You didnt even explain why changing the subject to distract/avoid wouldnt count. Since this argument wuz goin nowhere, i decided to do that. IOf you still have questiosn, ill answer but lemme tell you all i heard Blah, blah blah blah blah. You didnt own me still and i idnt own you. No one owned becuz the argument went nowhere and it wuz very pointless. I mean its such a little thing. If it wuz a big thing like "does god exist" "Is bush a good leader" "Should this person be banned". not becuz of somethin little. I forgot wut we were arguin about cuz it wuz jus so stupid. And dont even get away and post stuff like that im makin up excuses, im talkin stupid, or shit like that, this wut im sayin is the truth. This is no contest becuz of pointlesness.
look back at those threads. Both times you refused to answer back to my points on the argument, this means that if you do not have anything to say about the argument and you have no comments in your defence then you were owned which in fact did happen, Regardless of whether you changed the subject to distract/avoid letting everyone know you just got owned. 🙂