Thor vs. Makkari

Started by Paola2 pages

stay on topic... that's what the censor is for

Originally posted by Thunderstrike
Oooh. Somebody was clever. This is a spite thread.

thor v mak is a spite thread??! 😕 for who??

the fascination with mak in this forum is puzzling. all this talk of mak increasing his strength is silly in light of the fact he . . . NEVER HAS. thor has beaten ss who's as fast as mak and WAAYYYYY more powerful. ss also has WAY more speed feats. he's also beaten glads and everyone knows how fast he is. it would only take a couple hits and thor would win. i suppose mak could win, though i doubt he's strong enough to ko him with a speedblitz. anyone have any names mak has actually defeated on his own?

use what the character HAS DONE in these fights. you'd need to go up the eternal hierarchy to someone like sersi to find an eternal able to give thor a really good fight.

speed does not necessarily = victory.

and thor is far from slow . . .

Originally posted by leonidas
thor v mak is a spite thread??! 😕 for who??

the fascination with mak in this forum is puzzling. all this talk of mak increasing his strength is silly in light of the fact he . . . NEVER HAS. thor has beaten ss who's as fast as mak and WAAYYYYY more powerful. ss also has WAY more speed feats. he's also beaten glads and everyone knows how fast he is. it would only take a couple hits and thor would win. i suppose mak could win, though i doubt he's strong enough to ko him with a speedblitz. anyone have any names mak has actually defeated on his own?

use what the character HAS DONE in these fights. you'd need to go up the eternal hierarchy to someone like sersi to find an eternal able to give thor a really good fight.

speed does not necessarily = victory.

and thor is far from slow . . .

👆 ...could not have said it better.

Closed for general idiocy. 😬