Originally posted by TricksterPriestDid you just ignore my post?
Oh really? Then why were you attempting to use it as justification for Hulk beating Supes?"The writer stated in his opinion Superman wouldnt be enough to beat him."
I said the writer was speculating. He has no power over dc characters. I use writers interpretations over their own specific events not random speculation and them talking about how powerful their character is.
Pay attention. 🙂
Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Oh really? Then why were you attempting to use it as justification for Hulk beating Supes?"The writer stated in his opinion Superman wouldnt be enough to beat him."
Originally posted by quanchi112
Did you just ignore my post?I said the writer was speculating. He has no power over dc characters. I use writers interpretations over their own specific events not random speculation and them talking about how powerful their character is.
Pay attention. 🙂
Well that's a stupid question. I have you on ignore, of couse I ignore all your posts. 🙄
But you've used it for justication a few times.
Kandy: Because Sivaa was in the process of doing it, we don't know that the Black Celestial could in fact survive a big bang.
Originally posted by TricksterPriestNo I havent. I explain myself and the obvious differences between writers statements.
Well that's a stupid question. I have you on ignore, of couse I ignore all your posts. 🙄But you've used it for justication a few times.
Kandy: Because Sivaa was in the process of doing it, we don't know that the Black Celestial could in fact survive a big bang.
Sivaa was owned by Superman and Orion.
Originally posted by quanchi112
The writer stated in his opinion Superman wouldnt be enough to beat him.Again you ignore everything stated and continue to post out of character responses. Supes loses imo to WW Hulk and the writer of WW Hulk agrees.
I made an 'if then' statement. This is 101 logic. If the if is false then the then isn't necessarily true. If the if is true then the then is necessarily true. Get it?
The problem i have with this match is in quasar- cosmos in collision, we have malestrom create an black hole of sorts, as his cosmic awareness from eon , his anomaly and quantum bands power and his kenetic control created some sort of black hole, he was going to destroy the universe(if i remember correctly), the celestials showed up and did nothing, i dont have the comic with me, but i think it stated they could do nothing to stop it,not sure how many their were,..i will look into this before i say who would win....it is somthing of a universe destroying event a celestial host could not stop....just some thought 📖
The watchers speculated that the Celestials couldn't stop the anomoly, because they didn't inteferer, however the same host (the fifth which is the most powerful I believe) defeated the Goblin Force, but I have always found Maelstrom hard to gauge mostly based on the incident with Thanos...
btw the incident you are refering to I believe
Originally posted by Galan007
A collection of Watchers gather, to observe what could have been the end of all existence:[note the Watchers actually share space with the Prime Celestial Host, to witness this event].
Originally posted by Utrigita
The watchers speculated that the Celestials couldn't stop the anomoly, because they didn't inteferer, however the same host (the fifth which is the most powerful I believe) defeated the Goblin Force, but I have always found Maelstrom hard to gauge mostly based on the incident with Thanos...btw the incident you are refering to I believe
Thank you very much, i hate trying to convey my recollection of events into a debate, it does give the impression that the prime host was unable to stop it, but they never try, hmmmmmmmm
The whole race of celestials vs imperiex...its a tuff call, i would give imperiex the win over a host, but the whole race seems too much?
I might just check to see if there is an imperiex respect thread....just to give me some perspective.....once again thanks for the scans 😄
Originally posted by h1a8Again quit speaking in circles as no on understands you. The writer said his WW Hulk could beat Superman,this isnt enough for me to give WW Hulk the win at based purely on this but you trying to find fault with his statement is a waste of time. That was his opinion and leave it at that.
I made an 'if then' statement. This is 101 logic. If the if is false then the then isn't necessarily true. If the if is true then the then is necessarily true. Get it?
