Naga Sadow and Ludo Kressh Run the Guantlet

Why the **** are 4 and 5 ordered like that? Switch them and it'll be accurate.

I am not disputing that Ragnos was the strongest as it is definite. However, I don't think that there is any evidence that he would beat both Kressh and Sadow, let alone own them.

It doesn't make a difference what the order is IKC, they can put all of those in any order, and they would still go down at Ragnos.

Isn't the order completely balanced?

No, thats why you should never put Luke and Kun next to each other because then certain people on this forum will critisize you. In this particular match, the order is irrelevant since we know the only one who could take the duo down is Ragnos.

Luke and Kyp Durron > Kun and Ulic Quel-Droma aren't they?

No, Luke and Kun will never be solved in any argument.. Kyp has the force abilities over Ulic, Ulic has the saber abilities.

I'd agree with the order, but you'd need a powerhouse trio to contend with these guys: Luke, Exar, and Nadd, maybe.

Hmmm that would be a good fight Faunus... Sadow and Kressh against Luke, Kun and Nadd.. Interesting.

I'd actually say that the trio would take the two, although the ancients' familiarity with the Force techniques Kun and Nadd have to offer would be a problem.

Perhaps, any one of the third person would be too much to handle.

Originally posted by hord06
I am not disputing that Ragnos was the strongest as it is definite. However, I don't think that there is any evidence that he would beat both Kressh and Sadow, let alone own them.

Ragnos' power was never quantified. So if you want to be a pain in the ass about it, I could just as easily say that there's no evidence that Ragnos would beat Han Solo.

He was definitely the most powerful of the most powerful, including being more powerful than Sadow.

How did Sadow grow stronger after Ragnos' death? He was never shown training, never shown to accumulate new knowledge, he's possibly centuries old and was not even implied that he strength improved, much less dramatically.

The duo get to 6 or they make it.

I still don't see how you can possibly say Ragnos can't take the both of them if they feared him even while on his deathbed.

I don't know about Sadow, but Ragnos and Simus are centuries old.

I'd provide the picture itself, but photobucket.com's screwed up: here's the page.

The narration in the lower-left panel of the page states that Lord Simus lost his duel with Ragnos centuries ago, meaning that currently Simus is two or more centuries old. And that's assuming that the said Sith Lord was a newborn at the time of his ascension to the throne. A few hundred years of soaking up the Dark Side and its secrets, as well as being considered the greatest Sith magician of his time, has to equate to über. And taking into account the fact that Ragnos defeated him, the late Dark Lord must have been a beast,

I agree that Ragnos was the strongest. However lets look at the facts.

Naga Sadow hated Ludo Kressh beyond belief. As in wring his neck like wash towel hate. Vice Versa. Why the hell would they collaborate to kill their master? The thing is, they would never collaborate. Hell when Sadow decided to attack the Republic, Kressh was completely arguing against it. Same deal with Ragnos... they just would not be able to work together because their views are radically different. Woudn't the two get caught up in petty differences, so as to not to form a strong duo that could take out their master.

Woudn't they rather let their master die than actually work together?

It also seems that Kressh actually respected Ragnos to a degree, by his speech at the Dark Lord's funeral, and his reaction to the appearance of Marka's spectre.

Wasn't Kressh sort of an apprentice to Ragnos?

I think so. Ragnos was Kressh's master, and Simus was Sadow's master.

Yeah, that's a good observation there. Kressh was at least Ragnos' de facto heir and apprentice, and Simus was certainly Sadow's master.

I see a versus thread coming up.

Love the sig, btw.