siriuswriter
Senior Member
iiiiiiiiiiiick. the wizard of oz ['39 movie, and l frank baum's original series] have inspired some more of the greatest musical stage work and literature. "wicked" has turned into a trio of books, with more coming...
it really wouldn't be much different from '39 if makers say "we're coming straight off the book." i have three originally published versions of other novels in the oz series, and it's so completely innocent and contain not very much slapdashery for cinema. when '39 added what it did - the flying monkeys, making dorothy '16' although garland was in her early twenties, leaving out an entire number ['the jitterbug'] - those changes were quite actually needed to take a rather blah book and turn it into something entertaining. the books read like a picture book, and "dangerous situations" always have a very easy solution. so... yeah.
i djust don't think it would be very good.
they did make a modern day-wizard of oz - "The Wiz" with Diana Ross and Michael Jackson - i would recommend that film to anyone who wants to see a different side.
it's just good.
oh yes, and don't forget the muppet version. she had the same dress - dinermacized, and still had a dog - which i think was actually the rat... i don't fully remember. my point is that big cinema wizard of ozes are past their prime.
get idina menzel and kirsten chenoweth back together and make Wicked!, though.