Bram Stoker's Dracula Part 2

Started by deathbycorn1 pages

Bram Stoker's Dracula Part 2

Jan De Bont’s Blue Tulip Productions has teamed with Atchity Entertainment on a new feature which represents the first officially sanctioned sequel to Bram Stoker’s DRACULA. Tentatively titled THE UN-DEAD, after the subtitle of Stoker’s original novel, the script was written by Ian Holt and is set 25 years after the book’s events. All the surviving protagonists—including Jonathan and Mina Harker and Professor Van Helsing—appear, along with Inspector Cotford, a character cut from the original manuscript, facing the bloodsucking Count once again. The Stoker family has officially recognized Holt’s screenplay—the first adaptation to receive such approval since the original 1931 Bela Lugosi-starring film.

De Bont and co. are currently seeking a director for the project. “We’re going after someone who knows how to do big-budget, adult Gothic horror with top A-list actors like SILENCE OF THE LAMBS,” says De Bont, whose own next directorial venture is the giant-shark epic MEG for Atchity and New Line. “We’re not making a B-movie teen slasher film here. This is the DRACULA [sequel] the true fans have been waiting for.”

Holt, who also wrote York Entertainment’s DR. CHOPPER, began the project by acquiring the rights to the best-selling book IN SEARCH OF DRACULA and traveled to Transylvania and spending a night at Bran Castle (pictured), where the “real Dracula,” Vlad Tepes, spent time. “Me and a friend huddled in the room where Dracula’s wife jumped out the window to her death,” he says. “The sky was pitch black—there were no stars—and it was quiet, except for low moaning sounds every time the wind whipped through the crumbling walls of the castle. Needless to say, we didn’t get much sleep!”

Holt also visited the dark prince’s palace in Romania, and wound up being knighted by The Transylvanian Society of Dracula into the Order of the Dragon. In addition, he was allowed by a Stoker family representative to read Stoker’s original handwritten manuscript (where he discovered Cotford’s existence), currently stored under glass at Philadelphia’s Rosenbach Museum. “I had to put on white gloves to not get any oil from my fingertips on the pages,” Holt says. “A guard watched over me the whole time. I got to see Stoker’s handwritten notes in the margins. It was such an honor to be holding the second most popular book of all time behind the Bible. It brought tears to my eyes and brought me full circle with the story.”

Look for more details on this project as we find ’em out. —Michael Gingold

Re: Bram Stoker's Dracula Part 2

Originally posted by deathbycorn

De Bont and co. are currently seeking a director for the project. “We’re going after someone who knows how to do big-budget, adult Gothic horror with top A-list actors like SILENCE OF THE LAMBS,” says De Bont, “We’re not making a B-movie teen slasher film here. This is the DRACULA [sequel] the true fans have been waiting for.”

Me, me, me, me, me!!! 😱 😆

😐 i tel you know i wont be happy if this gets made the movie was marvelous and having a 'part 2 ' would just make it look tacky 🙁

never know maybe it will be another silence of the lambs........MAYBE

It's been a while since something really scary came out. All the movies nowadays, have blood and gore but doesn't carry good story plots or actors with the capacity to relate to their audience, so we really don't care if there's tons of violence. I hope de pont has an interesting plot line and good actors in this sequel. Dracula has so much potential and nobody is being successful at bringing it out. I mean look out Underworld Evolution and stuff, they focus so much on sci-fi and how immortal and powerful Vampires are, that they miss out on telling us the story.

Isn't it a little late for a 2nd?

Its not to late for a sequel it just doesnt need one

I have no idea when the first was made. I thought 1990's or something. Maybe when I was 5 years old which was 1995.

the first one was made in 1992

So it's been 14 years, see now to me that is a long time and so that's why I think it's too late, IMO.

i know its been awhile i think either way it doesnt need a sequel/prequel what ever this movie is bloody brillant as it is ..

I agree, I think I saw it when I was 13 or 14 and enjoyed it loads.

✅ good good

yeah, wonderful