I've changed my mind about Superman Returns now

Originally posted by Mr Parker
please enough with that laughable logic that because a movie made so much money at the box office its a great film. 👇

"laughable logic" huh?

it made so much money because many people went to see, a lot of the time more than once. and why did people go to see it? cos its a great film.

here's some more simple logic:

great films = successful
bad films = unsuccessful (e.g. a flop)

Well, im agree with my friend mr parker about this superman returns film. It looks pretty good, i will go to see it next wenesday in my country and i will post my review of it, but it looks pretty good. I think that superman 1 is the best comic book movie ever, with batman begins and sin city. But i think that superman returns could be as one of the best superheroe movies ever.

But i desagree about king kong, i loved the original king kong, i hated the 1976 remake, but i loved too the 2005 remake, it was pretty good, worse than the original, but a pretty good movie.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
please enough with that laughable logic that because a movie made so much money at the box office its a great film. 👇

I second that.

Personally, I thought the first Spider Man was OK & the second was a classic, but there is no strict relationship between box office take and quality. Great films get overlooked many times the first time they come out - The Wizard Of Oz, Citizen Kane, Raging Bull - while others get freakishly lucky. Titanic - people around the world lost their minds for six months; within two years no one could bear to sit through it again.

Originally posted by The Pict
here's some more simple logic:

great films = successful
bad films = unsuccessful (e.g. a flop)

So, keeping that supposed logic, citizen kane is a bad film.

Well, did you see it Mr Parker?