Originally posted by Smasandian
Remember last year with the Panthers?
They almost went to the wildcard after starting 0-4 or something higher than that.
But it's still surpraising that the Vikings are sucking since they improved thier defense. (Well maybe not).
Thats true, but Culpepper has to get it going though. If Culpepper doesnt throw 5 interceptions, the Bengals probaly wouldnt have had 37 points. The Vikings had lke 8 turnovers all togehter. IMO its kind of hard not to score 37 points when your oppenent turns it over 8 times. If Culpepper would have had maybe only 1 or 2 interceptions, and we only had 1 fumble, then i think the Bengals would have had maybe 21-24. Then the Vikings have 4 extra drives if you take away 3 interceptions and 1 fumble, so that 4 drives right there that continue and who knows what would happen. Culpepper throwing all them intercptions really messes up the offense and the defense.