Darth Maul vs. Darth Sion in Unarmed Combat!

The Master of teras kasi Darth Maul or the Lord of Pain Darth Sion who will be the last man standing? First knockout wins.

Darth Sion cant die, especially in unarmed combat, so...

He doesn't have to kill him just knock him out.

Maul would unleash Hell on him, but eventually Sion would grab Maul's face and savagely beat his skull in. Maul has more skill than Sion, but he wouldn't be able to bring him down.

Originally posted by jollyjim311
Maul would unleash Hell on him, but eventually Sion would grab Maul's face and savagely beat his skull in. Maul has more skill than Sion, but he wouldn't be able to bring him down.

And makes no sense.

Darth Sion has incredibly dexterity and massive physical strength. He'll tool Darth Maul in a fight.

Originally posted by The Creator
He doesn't have to kill him just knock him out.

I doubt Sion can be knocked out either...I mean if hes fine with literally falling apart, some punches wont do much harm.

Sion, by a long shot.

Any proof?

Originally posted by The Creator
And makes no sense.

Why? Sorry, I'll elaborate. Maul has shown to be an excellent unarmed fighter, and there is documented proof that he is a martial artist master. Sion can't be brought down, and would eventually get a hold of Maul and break him in half. Someone can have more skill, but still lose. Example? Here's one! I probably have more martial experience than a wampa, but I would get wasted! Yay wasted!

Originally posted by The Creator
Any proof?

The proof is common sense. If Sion is fine with his body falling apart, how could Maul do any real harm?

Originally posted by jollyjim311
Why? Sorry, I'll elaborate. Maul has shown to be an excellent unarmed fighter, and there is documented proof that he is a martial artist master. Sion can't be brought down, and would eventually get a hold of Maul and break him in half. Someone can have more skill, but still lose. Example? Here's one! I probably have more martial experience than a wampa, but I would get wasted! Yay wasted!

Dude... did you play KOTOR 2? Sion was a assassin and without a doubt a master at unarmed combat. Plus he's all but invincible!

Not only that, he lifts up Kreia with one hand and slams her into the wall.

They're both muscular, but Sion is more muscular.

Couple that with Sion's insane dexterity, and we can deduce that he has skill being the figurehead of the Sith and the greatest Sith assasin...

Lord Sion

Ancient Sith especially trained in unarmed combat. With the extra strength of Sion's fractured body, and his regeneration ability, Maul is nothing more than a mere insect in Sion's eyes.

Originally posted by Xepeyon
Ancient Sith especially trained in unarmed combat. With the extra strength of Sion's fractured body, and his regeneration ability, Maul is nothing more than a mere insect in Sion's eyes.

Sion does win, but Maul has shown us more unarmed combat ability. And where did you get that from? Ancient Sith practiced unarmed fighting? Sion wins because he can't be brought down, not because he has more skill.

I seemed logical to me. If ancient Jedi trained extensivly in U.C., how much more would the agressive Sith train.

Well fine, that's your opinion, but make sure next time you say that. There is a difference between "seemed logical to me" and "Ancient Sith especially trained in unarmed combat."

Sion wins, though Maul gets a few nice pucnhes in... punches that do hardly any damage to Sion.