Originally posted by tdtd
What do you mean impossible to predict? I'm going to say this again. It is very logical to assume that Kreia only has this technique as long as her life bond is tied to the Exile. Without it she has no technique, but she would give Yoda a run either way.. Yoda wins
Your unsupported assumptions dont need to be repeated, thanks.
Originally posted by tdtd
Actually they've been supported numerous times and accepted by others, so just because you can't comprehend them or choose not to doesn't mean they're unsupported. Thank you come again.
Ah. So plainly stating Yoda would win without any support as to why Yoda would be a better duelist isnt an unsupported assumption?
I'm not slashing out at anybody, just stating facts. Oh and GV, you were one of those people convinced, but now all of a sudden my convincing argument is an unsupported assumption? Perhaps you should view
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=403467&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=2
before continuing. And frankly without her instakill, all she has are stories about everything so she's more like a dark Odan Urr than anything.. Nothing about her puts her about Yoda.
Originally posted by tdtd
I'm not slashing out at anybody, just stating facts. Oh and GV, you were one of those people convinced, but now all of a sudden my convincing argument is an unsupported assumption? Perhaps you should view
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=403467&perpage=20&highlight=&pagenumber=2
before continuing.
I wasnt disagreeing with that you moron, I was questioning why Yoda would simply.. win.. even if Kreias instakill wasnt a factor.
Originally posted by tdtd
I shouldn't have to tell you that personal attacks are a logical fallacy. And if you weren't disagreeing with me, then perhaps you wouldn't provide ambiguous rebuttals such as "more unsupported assumptions". I wish I was a mind reader(with the force), but we live in reality.
Kreias being unable to cast instakill doesnt = Yoda wins. I question that because it is unsupported. Show valid reasons why Yoda would be able to defeat Kreia in combat.
Originally posted by tdtd
Um.. 900 years of Jedi knowledge, being a lightsaber master, having mastered the force conclusively, using atari like a cracked out muppet...Take your pick.
Feat wars. Great.
Traya has studied librarys of ancient sith knowledge. Malachor ring a bell? Traya is good with a lightsaber as well. Show me the support for this bullshit 'Yoda has mastered the force conclusively'. And the ability to use Atari doesnt give Yoda any credit applicable to this fight.
Feat Wars? Where have I listed feat wars? Do you understand the concept of feat wars? With your logic I would call "Traya has studied ancient sith knowledge" feat wars. Yoda is a force master, this is a known fact. Yoda is a lightsaber master, this is a known fact. Yoda has had 900 years of knowledge, and is the grand master of the council, this is fact. Yoda has never been beaten(and don't start the Sidious debate), this is obvious. Kreia was skull****ed when Nihilus ate the force from her, and Sion kicked her shit in.