And once again, GV you've been pwnt time and time again so I won't waste time on you. The Ancient Sith>All. It's been proven in every thread you've been in since you've returned from your exile lightsnake.. Stop trying to disprove facts.. And don't use your sourcebook logic either. The Ancient Sith>ALL.. This is FACT.. Thank you, see you douchebags tomorrow.
Originally posted by tdtd
And once again, GV you've been pwnt time and time again so I won't waste time on you. The Ancient Sith>All. It's been proven in every thread you've been in since you've returned from your exile lightsnake.. Stop trying to disprove facts.. And don't use your sourcebook logic either. The Ancient Sith>ALL.. This is FACT.. Thank you, see you douchebags tomorrow.
No.
Originally posted by tdtd
Right, and you told me to prove SImus was stronger as a full body, and I have. Again, Simus actually fought Ragnos which already speaks volumes for his strength and confidence, and he was the greatest alchemist. That puts him ahead of Kressh, and maybe Sadow.
1. No, you haven't. If so, then I can't find it. Copy paste it in bold if you please.
2. Simus only fought Ragnos because Ragnos wanted to kill him for the rank of DLOTS. You can't prove that Simus would have gone to fight Ragnos had it not been required to have even a chance to live.
3. Ragnos has more then a hundred years more experince by Ludo's time then he had when he defeated Simus.
4. Where's your proof that Simus was the greatest alchemist?
5. Even if you can prove that Simus was the greatest alchemist, how will it help him in a fight? How does it make him a better fighter then Ludo?