Hooray no more Pierce Brosnan as James Bond

Started by Dresta5 pages

i would have siad that Brosnan was the second best Bond, after Connery.

Originally posted by Dresta
i would have siad that Brosnan was the second best Bond, after Connery.

yea

i would have to agree

Originally posted by johnny cash fan
the new bond rocks.
pierce brosnan's acting was getting old.
the last bond he was in seemed stale, like week old french bread.
but you cant blame it all on him.
the directors give him cheesy typical lines.

..You call that acting?

Man you two guys cant spot horrible acting when its right there in front of your eyes. 😄

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Man you two guys cant spot horrible acting when its right there in front of your eyes. 😄

of course... or maybe its just you.

I agree absolutely with Mr.Parker! 😉

same for me: 1 = Moore, 2 = Connery
3 = Brosnan 4 = Dalton

no the classification for Craig and Lazenby, of bad imitations! 😖leep:

Originally posted by pr1983
of course... or maybe its just you.

and maybe they have the same logic that you-a man-spider fan has. 😄

Originally posted by tallyblack
I agree absolutely with Mr.Parker! 😉

same for me: 1 = Moore, 2 = Connery
3 = Brosnan 4 = Dalton

no the classification for Craig and Lazenby, of bad imitations! 😖leep:

see this poster for the most part can spot good acting.She ALSO realises Moore and connery were much better.I disagree with her though on putting Dalton behind the horrible acting of Brosnan though obviously.Dalton was better and should have stayed on if they wanted to continue the Bond series and Craig is easily much better than Brosnan as well.I put him ahead of Dalton also.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
and maybe they have the same logic that you-a man-spider fan has. 😄

hmm... the same logic shared by more people than would share yours...

your speaking matter of factly again, thats an awful habit...

those same people are allso the same people that are ignorant enough though to allow hollywood to brainwash them and cant think for themselves though. 😛 they have been so brainwashed by hollywood that they are incapable of thinking for themselves.fact.can either aceept it or live in denial on it. 😄

Connery certainly played the best Bond, likewise Brosnan looked most like the part. However looks can only take you so far without the personality to back you up. In terms of being Bond, Brosnan fell short by a considerable amount. My personal favourite is Connery, followed very closely by Moore.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
those same people are allso the same people that are ignorant enough though to allow hollywood to brainwash them and cant think for themselves though. 😛 they have been so brainwashed by hollywood that they are incapable of thinking for themselves.fact.can either aceept it or live in denial on it. 😄

wow, a conspiracy theory... how the mighty have fallen... well, thats assuming you were mighty in the first place, which you weren't... 😬

Originally posted by Rampant ox
Connery certainly played the best Bond, likewise Brosnan looked most like the part. However looks can only take you so far without the personality to back you up. In terms of being Bond, Brosnan fell short by a considerable amount. My personal favourite is Connery, followed very closely by Moore.

i think brosnan was a fine bond personally, i thought goldeneye was one of the best ever bond movies... he brought something to the role that hadnt been there before imo...

Originally posted by Rampant ox
Connery certainly played the best Bond, likewise Brosnan looked most like the part. However looks can only take you so far without the personality to back you up. In terms of being Bond, Brosnan fell short by a considerable amount. My personal favourite is Connery, followed very closely by Moore.

you my friend got logic and common sense. 👆 Yeah Brosnan was just being Brosnan in the Bond movies.He has been good in some other movies but he failed miserably in his portrayal of Bond.Like i said earlier,they should have stuck with Dalton since they insisted on continuing the series. 😠

Yeah I also am happy they got rid of Brosnan. I didn't like him as well as I did Connery and Moore.

Originally posted by DraconianDevil
But Jude Law, no no no definatly not.

Agreed! There's no way he could pull off Bond shock

Sorry but what excactly do you find bad in brosnan?????ok..you say that he plays the same as he was playing in remington steele..right??ok..Remington steele was a VERY-VERY succesful tv series with a LOT-LOT of fans!also...james bond is not like YOU imagine him(like Jude Law,with trendy clothes or something😛---this could be disgusting for a bond movie)..is like ian fleming imagined him!With CLASSIC STYLE(even old fashioned), WITH HUMOR,AND CHARMING!.....Pierce brosnan has ALL tose qualifications!and there are million of people out there to confirm what i am saying!!Sorry!And of course he passed his lines because these "lines" happened to be very similar to IAN FLEMING S JAMES BOND!....If those lines was not similar to Bond lines then the producers would have fired him...so..try to think like a bond fun!not like Spider-Man fun!James bond is not a trendy muscular freak like those you see in comics! 😛

Yeah, Pierce Brosnan wasn't very suitable for this role. It was really wierd to see him on the screen as Bond. He is a good actor ,but he doesn't have that kind of quality.
Personally, I think Roger Moore was the best James Bond. He's humorous and polite.More like a gentleman than a spy. Connery was a more classical Bond.

No Dalton wasn't good,and also Craig is not good(NOT GOOD AT ALL!!!)As about Moore...i DON'T like him..i don't....!!..it isn't nice to see people who look so "cold",(not cool!!),to play bond!Pierce brosnan was very qualified actor and very handsome guy(much more hansome and charming than Moore and Dalton )so he was very nice as bond!ALSO BOND IS A SPY!IS NOT JUST A GENTLE MAN!!SO...he must do some ACTION!!not to walk like a 60 year old man or to talk-talk all the the time and telling jokes(like Moore did)..!!Also to be a playboy like pierce brosnan looks like!!NOW WHAT THE F.... PLAYBOY COULD DANIEL CRAIG BE!?????IT SEEMS FAKE!!

Originally posted by Dresta
i would have siad that Brosnan was the second best Bond, after Connery.

I would have to agree with you.

Originally posted by dr-susan723
Yeah, Pierce Brosnan wasn't very suitable for this role. It was really wierd to see him on the screen as Bond. He is a good actor ,but he doesn't have that kind of quality.
Personally, I think Roger Moore was the best James Bond. He's humorous and polite.More like a gentleman than a spy. Connery was a more classical Bond.

you gal got good taste. 👆