It would be awesome to see Hillary against Arnold.
There was a bill on the floor awhile ago, (when Arnold was still popular in polotics) to grant an immagrant who had been a citizen for 20 years (and he has) to run for prez.
Can you imagine the spectacle? 😂
Seriously though, Id go with Guilanni.
He was the mayor of NY on 9/11, and is a strong conservative.
Originally posted by Deano
do you think electing a new president will end earths woes?the agenda is still the same no matter who is in office. and after the last rigged election farce, why would you ever want to vote again
I read this on a bathroom wall at a bar tonight…classic
“If voting really changed the system, it would be illegal”
people will vote for hillary. why? because she has a vagina. nothing more.
i find that sad. sad that the first woman president would be the second worst of not the worst president in u.s. history. so then she very well may be the last female president.
(i cant wait for the first tool to glaze over that post and cry "ZOMG SEXIST!!!!"😉
Originally posted by PVS
people will vote for hillary. why? because she has a vagina. nothing more.i find that sad. sad that the first woman president would be the second worst of not the worst president in u.s. history. so then she very well may be the last female president.
(i cant wait for the first tool to glaze over that post and cry "ZOMG SEXIST!!!!"😉
What do you hate about Hillary so much?
she is a waste. her entire career consists of tagging along and seizing opportunity. swell, only she accomplishes nothing.
perfect example would be her unconditional support of the war and complete lack of questioning regarding the war and everything related from prisoner abuse to our very reason for going there. then lets factor in her silence over the need for campaign and lobbying reform (of coarse, she'll wait till she's DONE with her election to bring it up...how quaint). it just seems her only purpose is to be the queen of hindsight, and once late 2007/2008 rolls around, watch how that all will change. watch how ALL OF THE SUDDEN its all important, and she would have done it all differently, etc
not a word. but just wait. wait till she "stands tall" and calls for change, when it promises to benefit her. i know there are far many more democrats equally responsible for this, but at the same time they dont stand a chance of being president.
forgot to mention, if i had the choice it would be obama.
*edit* and if anyone challenges me, i will simply create a thread "what has hillary clinton accomplished?" and we can all watch it sink like a stone in a pond.
Originally posted by PVS
she is a waste. her entire career consists of tagging along and seizing opportunity. swell, only she accomplishes nothing.
perfect example would be her unconditional support of the war and complete lack of questioning regarding the war and everything related from prisoner abuse to our very reason for going there. then lets factor in her silence over the need for campaign and lobbying reform (of coarse, she'll wait till she's DONE with her election to bring it up...how quaint). it just seems her only purpose is to be the queen of hindsight, and once late 2007/2008 rolls around, watch how that all will change. watch how ALL OF THE SUDDEN its all important, and she would have done it all differently, etcnot a word. but just wait. wait till she "stands tall" and calls for change, when it promises to benefit her. i know there are far many more democrats equally responsible for this, but at the same time they dont stand a chance of being president.
forgot to mention, if i had the choice it would be obama.
But isn't that mostly her personality....do you think she would do stupid thingas as a president?
Originally posted by Bardock42
But isn't that mostly her personality
no, not at all. opportunism with a lack of priority for whats best for 'the people'. thats mentallity and priority. personallity has nothing to do with it. quite frankly i dont know whether she's actually a pleasant person or a total b!tch, nor do i care.
Originally posted by PVS
no, not at all. opportunism with a lack of priority for whats best for 'the people'. thats mentallity and priority. personallity has nothing to do with it. quite frankly i dont know whether she's actually a pleasant person or a total b!tch, nor do i care.
Okay, yeah...I used the wrong word...but do you think if she was President, which she might be, that she would lead the country badly?
Obviously, Hilary is tricky, conniving, and publicly non-committal, but sadly that's the name of the game for most politicians. I think she'd do a good job considering the support she'd get from ol' Bill. Considering the rest of the Democratic hopefuls listed, I think she'd be in with the best chance of winning the gig.
Looking at the rest, John Edwards seems a little light-weight. John Kerry has no chance. Joe Biden looks burnt out, and as much as I like a lot of what Al Gore stands for, I don't think he has much of a chance. Therefore, with Obama seemingly sitting this one out, it's left to a choice between Hilary and McCain.