biggest obstacle to mars

Started by Darth Jello2 pages

seriously, no one thinks we should focus less on doing it now and more on developing FTL propulsion based on current theories in physics?

This issue has nothing to do with the human body OR cost. Because neither matter to a government. What does matter is the benefit of the exercise. And, right now, we aren't getting anything out of space exploration. Granted, we might, if we weren't watching our government thump bibles instead of looking at the situation more realistically.

Space exploration is only a capability of a "super power". And right now, the only "super power" left is the US of A...and it's too fu*ked up to do anything worth while.

...oxygen dependence?

Biggest obstacle: six months w/o gravity and all couped up. That's why I ain't going.

Originally posted by Mindship
Biggest obstacle: six months w/o gravity and all couped up. That's why I ain't going.

can you smoke?...that's what I'm wondering.

the biggest obstacle would be the movie "mars attacks" occuring.

Exploration is a part of human nature. Imagine if Christopher Columbus hadn't wanted to sail across the Atlantic and stayed in Spain, never really knowing what was out there...

Mars is just another place for us to explore, once we have the means of doing so.

Originally posted by Koala MeatPie
Allthought it is not a problem here, "Living" on any other planet bigger then that fo Earth (even just a bit bigger) WILL kill you.

The human body can resist just about Any Amount of Gs for a limited amount of time. (which is why some Parachute misshaps don't always kill) This is true for everything, Drive your car for too long and You Will die, crushed to death. (Might take several hundred years of non stop driving, but it will happen)

First of all, Mars is SMALLER than the Earth, so living on The red Planet would not be a problem gravity-wise. And even if Mars was somewhat bigger, that still wouldn’t KILL us. And driving a car for a long time does not create any G’s (unless you drive fast into something), so that’s a rather peculiar logic of badly phrased argument.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Bodies would adjust, KMP

Space exploration is a barren seam- it needs vast investment and gives you almost nothing back. That's why no-one has bothered, what with all the other problems in the world.

Space-exploration actually does give us a lot back:
Enriched babyfood, ski boots, cardiac monitors, night vision cameras, scratch resistant lenses, Teflon, structural analysis, Windows Visual New Reader, air quality monitors, advanced keyboards, laser surveying, aircraft controls, lightweight compact disk, water purification systems, ribbed swimsuits, portable coolers/warmers, athletics shoes, dustbusters, shock-absoring helmets, home security systems, smoke detectors, flat panel television, high-density batteries, trash compactors, food packaging and freeze-dried technology, cool sportswear, sports bras, hair styling appliances, fogless ski goggles, self-adjusting sunglasses, composite golf clubs, hang gliders, art preservation, and quartz crystal timing equipment.
Oh and radiation insulation, fire resistant materials, Whale identification method, environmental analysis, noise abatement, pollution measuring devices, pollution control devices, smokestack monitor, radioactive leak detector, earthquake prediction system, sewage treatment, energy saving air conditioning, and air purification.
Want more???

http://www.thespaceplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html#chr

@whirly

Originally posted by PVS
it just doesnt matter. they should prioritise and put all resources to planetary defense (against asteroids deano, not lizard men) and exploration via telescopes/probes etc. who the **** cares if a guy walks on mars. what does it accomplish? "ZOMG WE PUT A GUY ON MARS" and then the next day rense.com calls it all a fraud and a hollywood creation. priorities should be set straight.

🙂 i meant to just quote it but accudentally bumped the thread

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
@whirly

🙂 i meant to just quote it but accudentally bumped the thread

haha Mars is a shit plan. Lighter note a scorpion has got in the house and I am spraying under the kitchen counter with sniper ready to stamp the ****er if it makes a run for it.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
haha Mars is a shit plan. Lighter note a scorpion has got in the house and I am spraying under the kitchen counter with sniper ready to stamp the ****er if it makes a run for it.

So, is "Scorpion" and "got on the house" slang for someone you plan to shoot witth a sniper rifle?

Originally posted by cdtm
So, is "Scorpion" and "got on the house" slang for someone you plan to shoot witth a sniper rifle?
Nah, it is literally one of the ****ers. Sniper is a brand of household pesticide you get in the tropics.

We don’t deserve to go to Mars until we fix all of our problems here on Earth.

Translation: Never.

Originally posted by Impediment
We don’t deserve to go to Mars until we fix all of our problems here on Earth.

Translation: Never.

Never say never when the apex predators want to do it off our backs and goods purchased. Vunt boy musk is making robots so the poor have no low skilled jobs and die of starvation. Surely curing cancer is money better spent.

Wow, nostalgia

Interesting thread 👆

I expect humanity to go to Mars within a relatively short time period (10-20 yrs)

We’re not going to Mars. I’ve been to Mars, it was a girl from university whose last name was Mars, she’s a teacher now, and she was/is hot! I’m just bragging.

But do you know how ****ing far away that planet is from ours? Not only that, you have to take the orbits into consideration.