Thor(no hammer) vs. Superman

Started by batdude1232 pages

Re: Re: Thor(no hammer) vs. Superman

Originally posted by TheKahn
eer

So how exactly would the outcome of this fight differ from a standard Hammer-wielding Thor vs Superman fight? The combatants are the same and the same abilities of each would still come into play (with the caveat that now, obviously, Thor couldn't be stripped of Mjolnir).

I agree. It's basically pointless to take away his hammer but still keep the hammer's powers. What's the difference between that, and him keeping the actual hammer? 😕

Well the point is my dear friends is, that Thor wouldn't use the hammer as clobbering bat. He would use his god given abilities to fight hand to hand . Plus what ever other abilities the hammer grants him.

Originally posted by JOE NUNEZ
Well the point is my dear friends is, that Thor wouldn't use the hammer as clobbering bat. He would use his god given abilities to fight hand to hand . Plus what ever other abilities the hammer grants him.

🤨 I still don't really see much of a difference.

Hey batedude, Ive noticed you always hate on my threads.I think its not personal , but I do think it comes out of or main disagreement Marvel or Dc. Yeah you lean to DC heroes while I tend to like Marvel. What ever our biases let's not hate on threads. If you don't like my thread simply don't participate, but when you make comments like this thread is stupid, it just takes up useless space.Anyway wouldn't this Thor be better , I mean he wouldn't have to rely on his hammer like he usually does.

Originally posted by JOE NUNEZ
Hey batedude, Ive noticed you always hate on my threads.I think its not personal , but I do think it comes out of or main disagreement Marvel or Dc. Yeah you lean to DC heroes while I tend to like Marvel. What ever our biases let's not hate on threads. If you don't like my thread simply don't participate, but when you make comments like this thread is stupid, it just takes up useless space.Anyway wouldn't this Thor be better , I mean he wouldn't have to rely on his hammer like he usually does.

I'm not hating at all. 🙂 I always enjoy the Thor vs. Superman threads. By the way, I like Marvel just as much as I like DC. Just because my favorite character is Batman, does NOT mean that I like DC anymore than I like Marvel. It may seem that way to you, but that is not the case. 😄 Anyways, I just didn't really see much of a difference ON HOW THE OUTCOME OF THE FIGHT WOULD DIFFER THAN ANY OTHER TIME. That's all I was trying to say. However, I DO think that this version of Thor would be a little bit cooler. He wouldn't have to always rely on the hammer. That's a good idea JOE! 💃

Originally posted by batdude123
I'm not hating at all. 🙂 I always enjoy the Thor vs. Superman threads. By the way, I like Marvel just as much as I like DC. Just because my favorite character is Batman, does NOT mean that I like DC anymore than I like Marvel. It may seem that way to you, but that is not the case. 😄 Anyways, I just didn't really see much of a difference ON HOW THE OUTCOME OF THE FIGHT WOULD DIFFER THAN ANY OTHER TIME. That's all I was trying to say. However, I DO think that this version of Thor would be a little bit cooler. He wouldn't have to always rely on the hammer. That's a good idea JOE! 💃
Instead of an ''S'' on his chest he would have a pic of the hammer.

Re: Thor(no hammer) vs. Superman

Originally posted by JOE NUNEZ
Odin has merged all of the hammer's powers into Thor. So basically it's Thor no hammer, but with all of the hammers powers. Can he match supes ? who wins.

He can beat superman without the hammer on purely physical terms since superman is certainly not stronger than Drax the Destroyer with the Power Gem. Also, Thor doesnt need the hammer to summon lightning.