Sylvia and DSHS never responded to my “full and timely disclosure” request. They did however call my father, James Lowell, and told him of the request, read it to him, told him that they were going to start involving upper management at DSHS, and threatened to revoke our license unless we met in person for questioning. Meeting in person was exactly what I had wanted to do all along, and I had already requested it specifically to Sylvia, so I readily agreed when my father proposed a date and time, though I set the expectation to my father that I would not answer any questions regarding firearms I own and keep inside my personal residence to the DSHS investigators.We met at the adult family home, however, the DSHS investigatos (Sylvia, and her supervisor who’s name I don’t have) would not exit their vehicle to meet with us until police arrived 15 minutes later to escort them while they were in my presence, a sign that they believed I was a very dangerous person. Two Spokane Valley police officers arrived, and escorted us into the AFH. The Spokane Valley Police officers were very cordial. At this time, I started recording everything on my camera phone for my own protection. We briefly stopped inside so that the investigators could again see my locking gun cabinet where I store my firearms when I’m not carrying. They did not ask me to unlock and open the gun cabinet where my home defense shotgun was currently stored, for which I am grateful, as a home defense shotgun can appear very intimidating to those who are gun shy or are in-experienced with firearms. They would not remark on anything to show what they might have been thinking, just took some notes and thanked us for showing the locking gun cabinet.
So that the police presence would not disturb residents or guests, we had our meeting out on the patio, while the police officers stood out in the back yard to supervise. I was asked if I had a weapon on me at that time, and I told them I didn’t, as I had just driven into town from a vacation weekend at our family lake cabin at Christina Lake, BC. Normally I carry every time I’m out of my home, but because I can’t carry in Canada, I did not have my CCP that day.
The meeting was very cordial; the DSHS investigators were also very cordial and non-hostile. They had also dropped all of their questions they had been calling my family members and employees about my personal firearms that I own and keep in my personal residence. Mostly their questions were about why we find it necessary to carry a firearm at work, and what firearms I have brought to work. I also keep a home defense shotgun, loaded with bean bag rounds, permanently stored at the adult family home (up until now) locked in my gun cabinet. When asked what made it a “home defense” shotgun, and how it was different than a hunting shotgun. I explained that it had a longer magazine tube, a door breaching choke, a pistol grip with extendable but stock, and a flashlight attached to the front for proper identification of targets. In their documentation, they refer to it as a “modified” shotgun. Every feature on my shotgun is store bought and completely legal. It does however look incredibly intimidating. My philosophy about a home defense firearm, is that the more “intimidating” it looks, the less chance you’ll ever have to use it, because you stand a better chance of scaring away an attacker without having to discharge your weapon.
After 30 minutes or so, the police asked if they could leave, and the investigators said they were fine and gave them permission to leave. My father and I were very relieved after the 40 minute meeting. The meeting went well, and we had believed that we expressed our views on firearms, and answered the investigators questions to their satisfaction. Despite our having complied with the firearms laws, my father further offered the DSHS investigators to adopt a no firearms policy in the AFH, as long as we could substitute the firearm with a Taser and pepper spray. The investigators said they would consider the offer. We expected the matter to be closed soon. I also have a full recording of this meeting.
But it didn’t end there.
Over the next week, Sylvia made a couple of calls to Tracy Michelbook, our resident care manager to get copies of our resident’s care plans. We are accustomed to requests for our residents care plans by DSHS during every normal inspection by our licensors, and thought nothing of it. Little did we know, that they were collecting the information because they were planning to revoke our AFH License.
On September 13th, my father received the notice, and was called down to the DSHS office to be informed our adult family home was being shut down, and that I was no longer permitted to enter the facility, presumably because they have decided that I’m a danger to the residents, and that James Lowell was not fit to be a provider because he knowingly allowed me to carry a concealed firearm while at work caring for elderly residents.
That is the story. I have recordings on my cell phone of the encounter with the deputies in August, as well as recordings of the meeting with the DSHS investigators. I’m grateful that I have the recordings of the interactions, because the deputies, DSHS personnel, and the CPS agent Ron Stewart are painting me as a belligerent, un-cooperative, and dangerous person who owns a gun. The recordings plainly show I am non-hostile, non-belligerent, and quite cordial to everyone, despite how they were treating me. I reviewed the recording of the meetings, and I can’t understand how anyone of sound reasoning and common sense could possibly be doing the things they are doing to me, or to my employees, and to my residents. I never thought it could happen to me. That regardless of my responsible gun ownership, clean criminal record, that I’ve been carrying a CCP at work for 3 years incident free, and that I am among the 2% of the gun owning population that takes formal firearm training classes (I have over 100 hours of pistol and home defense shotgun safety and defense training from Ed Santos at Center Target Sports in Post Falls, ID) I have been labeled a villain. A criminal. My business has been shut down. My employees will lose their jobs. My elderly residents will be evicted from their home. My livelihood is in jeopardy. Since I’ve been disbarred from the AFH, it is doubtful that DSHS will ever allow me to work in the elder care industry again, and permanently label me as a dangerous person in my DSHS background check if I ever tried to seek employment related to elder care, child care, or any health industry DSHS oversees in their regulatory duty.
I tried looking into legal help from an attorney, and quickly discovered how many thousands of dollars it would cost for me to access the law in any useful way. I’m not a rich person. I pay my bills like any other citizen. I have a small and modest home I bought last December, but I’m proud of it, as it is my first home I’ve ever owned. But the cost of accessing the law for an average man like me is just too great. So I can only hope that I can find help wherever I can.
I hope my story will be read by many. I hope my story will reverse all of the awful things that have been done to me, my employees, my mother, my elderly residents and to liberty this past month. If not, America is not the bastion of freedom that I thought it was, and our bill of rights in the constitution is nothing but hollow words written in some old document that no one cares about anymore. I can barely write this paragraph without breaking down and crying.
In closing, I’d like to quote some words that I still remember from childhood.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably. These words were spoken as wisdom, and warning. The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we are all damaged." ~Captain Jean-Luc Picard
God bless you and yours,
Spencer Lowell