The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

Started by Lord Stark3,287 pages
Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Pr0n spamming, lol.

Yup. I was like 12 years old, not much older than PT is today.

Originally posted by Astor Ebligis
I'm not actually familiar with this quanchi character, but he makes some valid points, namely that people have a tendency to argue that characters can and will use their powers in a manner that is outside the scope that they are shown to use them in the media they are explored in. That Jedi/Sith are regularly challenged by non-Force Users would suggest that this isn't a simple matter of absence of proof =/= proof of absence, and I don't think you can blame this entirely on PIS.

As it stand, quanchi is thoroughly outdebating Nai and provided that Nai doesn't bring anything else to the table I believe we would have to declare quanchi the victor.

As it stands, I'm not even debating with quan, so how would he be able to outdebate me? Nice baiting attempt, though. It won't work. But it was very well done. You may want to try begging instead.

Originally posted by Eminence
Spoiler:
I've grown to appreciate PT's presence. He's a fairly high-level troll, and there is artistry in this.
Spoiler:
Oh, you're quite good yourself there, Faunz.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I never played PS😮, but it sounds like they botched the lore something fierce. Wait, nvm; it's a reboot. ****ing lame.

PSO was a seriously amazing game. I've never had more fun with a PS game. It was awesome. Not story-strong, like the PS series, but it had it's own strengths that made it a blast.

Don't fuck with it, Janus. I'll eat your goddamn heart.

Quoted for Nai, from 3-5 pages back.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You seem to be projecting here.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FvTa1vxmY3M

3:14--3:16 we see a force user force push Grievous but unable to to pin him against a wall and kill him. You make things up and ignore how their powers are portrayed in the films. He pushes him back like all force pushes. I mean you don't even grasp how the attack is used and it's down more than once yet have the audacity to call me desperate.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7oGf-a1Dqlc

You said a Jedi could disarm him with a gesture.

14 or so sends in this video we see Windu can't easily disarm Fett because he's too busy blocking his laser blasts and then jumping away from the flame thrower.

44 seconds in we see him force push his saber back not easily hold Jango in place because that has never happened just you making up feats again.

Jango's jet pack was damaged by the beast so he can't get away when Windu charges and decaps him. That is what Jedi basically do close the distance and attack with their sabers for the most part.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7LJS3YYTCN8

You said [B]any Jedi could disarm any skilled gun user easily. Here is proof I have evidence in the span of two seconds that isn't true at all.

8:12--8:14 Jango easily shoots down a Jedi.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xmR1ee223zQ

I have evidence that supports me while you just make up feats. Like I said keep cooking up feats because evidence will always support me not your fantasies. [/B]

Nai knows when he's beaten. He's a sensible man who knows his limits.

Originally posted by Tzeentch
Nai knows when he's beaten. He's a sensible man who knows his limits.

There are too many in this forum, and in general, that believe the last word/response is a victory. It's actually a bit unsettling how common it is.

Originally posted by The Renegade
There are too many in this forum, and in general, that believe the last word/response is a victory. It's actually a bit unsettling how common it is.
There are also too many in this forum, and in general, that don't know what the word "facetious" means.

To believe otherwise is to not understand people, imo. Very very few people ever have their actual opinions on a subject "swayed" by the argument of someone else, especially on the internet. When debates end it's usually because one person feels that there's no point in replying, not because they've been "illuminated". Hence, most internet debates are just people butting heads for awhile.

On the subject of Quan specifically, I'm pretty sure he doesn't even actually read peoples' arguments when he responds to them most of the time. So it's a massive waste of your time if you're going into it with the intention of making him look like a fool, or something. He doesn't care, and everyone knows he's a fool before the discussion even begins.

Spoiler:
Goddammit. Shut up, Blax.
Originally posted by The_Tempest
Spoiler:
Goddammit. Shut up, Blax.
Spoiler:
You, my "Lord", have lost!

Really looks like he's about to suck it.

Watch it.

Originally posted by The_Tempest

My sentiments exactly.

Sentiments sounds a lot like sentimental. You're a girly man, Beef.

Originally posted by Nai
As it stands, I'm not even debating with quan, so how would he be able to outdebate me? Nice baiting attempt, though. It won't work. But it was very well done. You may want to try begging instead.

Declaring that you're not debating with him isn't the same thing as actually not debating with him, which you evidently have been, and in those few exchanges you've been utterly crushed.

There's absolutely no shame in that though Nai, quanchi is clearly a gifted thinker and a being of immense sexual prowess, and it will take quite the talented individual to be able to match wits with him.

A lot of you seem to suffer from small penis syndrome. Didn't know there was an epidemic on this forum.

We don't want to be like you, Beefy. We want to be you.

I just want him.