Originally posted by aalyasecura95
lmao, you already responded to those comments earlier and now you're responding to them again with the same pro-trump propoganda. broken record.also you're voting for a clown to become next president and have the nuclear codes so i think you're the clown here. 👆 .
So you want to be tough on Russia but at the same time give them Uranium??
Nope not trump progoganda
Written by the NYT.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So you want to be tough on Russia but at the same time give them Uranium??
you're going around in circles here lol. i already stated my position
Originally posted by aalyasecura95
but that was transaction involving cash so the uranium was paid for. thats how trade works but i know you trumpsters want to shut down trade. also there is plenty of uranium to go around let's not fool ourselves. we also have more money so its not like the uranium is irreplacable.
let's also remember that russia only became a serious threat recently so it may not have seemed like a bad thing that much back then.
also read this:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wh...nium-2016-10-26
start reading from : "It’s all very, very troubling. Apart from just one teensy weeny little problem."
Originally posted by aalyasecura95
it may be dangerous but easily replacable as we are the richest country on earth. there is plenty to go around and we must trade sometimes even if you trump people want to stop trade.
Hey — had you heard that uranium is an incredibly scarce resource and that Russia is buying it all up?
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-hillary-clinton-sold-americas-uranium-2016-10-26
Your own source proves you wrong...
Originally posted by Time-Immemorialdid you even read the ****ing link lmao? uranium is abundant and the prices are low and falling. it is easily replaceable and we're the richest country and could buy a shit ton more uranium than russia ever could.
So you want to be tough on Russia but at the same time give them Uranium for nukes??Your position stinks like this, find a new one cause its total hypocrisy.
and LOL he is being sarcastic when he says it is incredibly scarce. read further lmao.
Bullshit, she isnt going to do shit to Russia, her own staff calls her naive about Putin.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorialwell russia only owns 0.4% more of the uranium output of the world because of that deal.... and can easily be rescinded and the uranium replaced. quoting from the article:
Lol😂Gotcha😂
Anyways you dont understand the deal, she gave our Uranium rights in the US to Russia, meaning they own stake in America now.
Meanwhile, despite the panic, U.S. uranium output isn’t very important anyway. According to the World Nuclear Association, the U.S. ranks ninth among global producers. Our production is less than one quarter of Australia’s and less than one tenth of Canada’s. The U.S. accounts for about 2% of total uranium production worldwide — meaning that the U.S. mines now in Putin’s hands account for about 0.4% of world output.
Whoa! You can really see why Vladimir Putin wanted “control” of it
Originally posted by Time-Immemorialjust a smear from wiklileaks we don't even know if they're 100% true or not. anyway the opinion of 1 staffer is not enough to discredit hillary's lifetime of experience.
Bullshit, she isnt going to do shit to Russia, her own staff calls her naive about Putin.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorialwell many people are jealous of hillary because she is about to be president... and hillary has loads of experience so 1 staffer cannot discredit it right off the bat. no fly zone will also stop the syrian refugees from being bombed by russia. maybe not the perfect way but hillary will have advisers and generals to help her pull it off in the best possible way.
Nope, that is a real email. Her own staff wrote it. She wants to make a no fly zone in Syria😂
Originally posted by Time-Immemorialno it is what the conservatives want they always start the wars. also she has done many things overseas that are very good, like her historic speech in china on women's rights, her overseeing of bin laden's death with obama and her negotiating of trade deals and action on climate change.
It will ensure a war with Russia, which is exactly what you liberals want.Name one thing she did overseas in the best way possible.
Originally posted by aalyasecura95I agree she has loads of experience at making bad deals, bad calls, and bad mistakes, so she has experience but its bad experience.
well many people are jealous of hillary because she is about to be president... and hillary has loads of experience so 1 staffer cannot discredit it right off the bat. no fly zone will also stop the syrian refugees from being bombed by russia. maybe not the perfect way but hillary will have advisers and generals to help her pull it off in the best possible way.
Originally posted by aalyasecura95
no it is what the conservatives want they always start the wars. also she has done many things overseas that are very good, like her historic speech in china on women's rights, her overseeing of bin laden's death with obama and her negotiating of trade deals and action on climate change.
She voted for the war in Iraq, she invaded Libya, killed gaddafi, Also
"There’s no doubt that Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street. Even more dangerous, though, is that she is the candidate of the military-industrial complex. The idea that she is bad on the corporate issues but good on national security has it wrong. Her so-called foreign policy “experience” has been to support every war demanded by the US deep security state run by the military and the CIA."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/hillary-is-the-candidate_b_9168938.html