Originally posted by slayne
She's referring to this: http://www.swtor.com/community/showthread.php?p=9347029#edit9347029Musco also states in the same post that Valkorion let the Smuglander kill him so he could overthrow his children, and also accomplish a host of other goals along with it.
Soo...what I'm reading is this...
Vitiate had the power at the beginning to do...well all of what he was going to do, he gets wounded, then he regains the power again.
So...doesn't this just completely ruin any power scaling of characters?
But then again, I don't think the TOR writers really care about that sort of thing..
From what I'm getting at also in that post in implying, Zakuul was no match for the Republic or SE when either at its full power. So there goes that notion of the Eternal Fleet being a threat to them, much less later eras. (Course as we see later, a single fleet of Alliance forces being able to tango with the fleet also covers that.)
I kinda also have to agree with that one poster. Vitiate/Valk should have been two separate guys, nothing would have really changed if they had been. They could have still had the story and not have this radically split personality persona change with the Sith Emperor.
Hey, all. Check out the mod I've been working on for Battlefront II: http://imgur.com/a/SZIgs
Will your Caedus RT be in the readme?
Originally posted by AncientPower
Except Boyd claims he would've spared Zakuul, allowing him the greatest empire from which to rule for eternity.
Which is still a retarded plan. What kind of galactic empire exists in a universe with only one habitable planet, anyways?