The Battle Bar, Our Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy

> calls me a shit debater.
> refutes nothing I've posted.

Pew Research is a Nazi White Supremacist Organisation!
You're pathetic, go outside.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Sure but this claim would require you to address the arguments on their merits and not to just dismiss them on your whim.

There are no merits in racism. Nor is anyone required to put up with it to fulfil some arbitrary debate etiquette.

Neph, Christ...

You don't believe in free speech? Can't make jokes? It's fine for news outlets to advocate the persecution of whites, but I can't make fun of an overweight Asian? Or post FACTS from surveys about the attractiveness of different races.

Socks don't have rights.

The whole reason I'm a sock is because I was banned for the exact same thing many times... race realism.

Originally posted by Benithesoyboy
Neph, Christ...

You don't believe in free speech? Can't make jokes? It's fine for news outlets to advocate the persecution of whites, but I can't make fun of an overweight Asian? Or post FACTS from surveys about the attractiveness of different races.

poor racist man. :'(

Originally posted by Nephthys
There are no merits in racism. Nor is anyone required to put up with it to fulfil some arbitrary debate etiquette.

Circular logic, and yeah in a debate forum there is typically some etiquette that includes "don't label things you don't like racist and then dismiss them", which is less arbitrary and more like the basis of all debate. If I said that black people are more likely to get sickle cell disease should I get banned? What if I say white people are more likely to become serial killers? Where do you draw the line without needing to analyze the arguments first?

Ah yes, what poor form not to properly debate someone on whether or not an actress deserves to be shot. What cowardice not to discuss the merits of the statement "Asians are basically whites with pointier teeth and eyes."

For shame.

FOR SHAME!

tbf Ziggy is a troll who isn't interested in productive discussion regardless of whether it's politics or SW; I was more talking about the general principle.

In general principle you should not debate racist trolls.

Seriously man, think things through a bit, lol.

Yeah but I see you labeling anyone who isn't a social liberal a "racist troll".

you literally just said he was a racist troll though

maybe don't make a point of not calling someone a thing when the example is that thing exactly

Also you "see" me doing that? So you're just assuming that I do? Seems like you're talking bollocks tbh.

Originally posted by Nephthys
There are no merits in racism. Nor is anyone required to put up with it to fulfil some arbitrary debate etiquette.

I mean if we don't allow fascists and white supremacists to be professors then we shouldn't allow other identitarians or marxists to be professors.

Originally posted by Nephthys
you literally just said he was a racist troll though

maybe don't make a point of not calling someone a thing when the example is that thing exactly

Also you "see" me doing that? So you're just assuming that I do? Seems like you're talking bollocks tbh.

lol i've seen you in political debates before.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Ah yes, what poor form not to properly debate someone on whether or not an actress deserves to be shot. What cowardice not to discuss the merits of the statement "Asians are basically whites with pointier teeth and eyes."

For shame.

FOR SHAME!

Originally posted by The Ellimist
lol i've seen you in political debates before.

What, in the Gen. Discussion forum? 😆

Calling those guys trolls is generousity on my part.

Wanna one v one on a political issue?

No.