http://www.cracked.com/article/167_5-reasons-star-wars-sequels-would-be-worse-than-prequels/
Pretty hilarious. Cracked is always good. I definitly agree with the last one(#1) can we just retcon Legacy already?
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/10/23/2106777.aspx
Tell me this: and I want a serious answer, How does the President get off campaigning for SOMEONE ELSE for governor, when he is supposed to be fixing the economy, and figuring out what to do about troop levels in afghanistan? We are paying the man to be president, and instead he is campaigning. Washington is full of thieves. I know the ex-President Bush did the same thing, so i'm not attacking Obama personally. I want to know WHY DO WE ALLOW THIS?
Originally posted by Nephthys
Exactly, who would blame it on the butterfly?*waits to see who gets joke.*
Simpsons quote. Bart contepmplating a future life in which
[list=a]
[*]He is a butterfly
and
[*]He has lit [something precious to Principal Skinner] on fire
[/list]
I'm having trouble thinking of context, and I refuse to google a Simsawns episode. Help?
Originally posted by Dr McBeefingtonIt is to an extent, making it large, but not infinite. Human can know quite a bit and learn quite a bit and understand quite a bit. Humans can't. People are idiots, person is smart.
Here's something you philosophers might enjoy. Last night I spent two hours arguing with 2 guys who believe that human understanding, or rather human capacity for knowledge, is infinite.