Originally posted by Lord Lucien
I think what he means is that for some people, it's easier and more practical/sensible to give such loyalty and devotion to a physical entity than it is to a god. Every civil war England ever had that involved a pretender to the throne involved people loyal to both camps. I'm willing to bet their followers' loyalties lay more with the person and their position/power/money than their supposed divine connection.
Sure, it may be easier. Doesn't mean that it's smarter, though.