Darth nihilus vs DN luke

Started by BLAK FOX2 pages
Originally posted by Great Vengeance
The burden of proof is on you, to show us why Lukes insta-kill is worth considering in this fight. Since there is no proof that Lukes insta-kill would work on Nihilus(Its only been used on a Vong)you have no real argument. And ofcourse the same applies to those who think Nihilus can just drain Luke.

I already explained it in my other post. It is not concrete evidence but it is still my opinion and until it is refuted, I will continue believing so.

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
No...the default position is skepticism. You saying 'Lukes insta-kill will work on Nihilus' is a positive statement that is up to you to prove.

You miss my point. I'm not trying to establish my opinion as fact and I'm not trying to prove my stance. I was just voicing my opinion and it doesn't matter to me whether people agree or not. However if people wan't to disregard it, until they refute it I will continue believing so.

Originally posted by BLAK FOX
I already explained it in my other post. It is not concrete evidence but it is still my opinion and until it is refuted, I will continue believing so.

Your original post has no real value at all, sorry. We cannot just 'agree to disagree' because your the one that made a positive statement...only you have no proof. My position is naturally correct in this instance, I dont need to refute anything.

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
Your original post has no real value at all, sorry. We cannot just 'agree to disagree' because your the one that made a positive statement...only you have no proof. My position is naturally correct in this instance, I dont need to refute anything.

Is proof always required when making arguments? Ever heard of logical deduction?

Originally posted by BLAK FOX
Is proof always required when making arguments? Ever heard of logical deduction?

Sound logical deduction is based on facts...or proof if you will. You dont have any.

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
Sound logical deduction is based on facts...or proof if you will. You dont have any.

You forgot common sence. It is logical to assume that the attack would work on normal force sensetives as well as Vong because it is still a force attack and the Vong are part of the force.

The Vong are part of a different force. And Emerald Lightning was created through the unifying force. The unifying force is outside of the force.

Are you sure because I always remembered the Vong being on a higher level of the force and not on a different level.

No, the Unifying Force is a different level of the Force...how can the Unifying FORCE be outside 'The Force?'

Oh really. Then Luke's attack probably wouldn't work on Nihilus.

Why would force attacks not work on Ni? He drains the force from living beings, there's no reason to assume offensive attacks, which have been shown to work on the Exile himself and, if we can't the game, Nihilius, then...

No I mean his EL attack. Of course other attacks would work on Nihilus.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
No, the Unifying Force is a different level of the Force...how can the Unifying FORCE be outside 'The Force?'

Simply because it is a different part of the force. Outside the force meaning different than what we perceive as jedi using force powers.

Err at least thats what I meant.

if it comes to a force battle nihilus pwns but lightsaber, nihilus dies in 2 secs