Intelligent Design

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Turning this into a debate is a worst case scenario in this community.

What? Any thread in a forum of this type is a debate, look at them. 😆

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
I've done research, evolution is riddled with in doctrine and hoaxes ( piltdownman, pig toe, etc)

Piltdown man had for some time become regarded as an aberration that was entirely inconsistent with the mainstream thrust of human evolution as demonstrated by fossil hominids found elsewhere. The identity of the Piltdown forger remains unknown. The finger of suspicion has been pointed at Dawson, Woodward, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (who worked at the site in 1913 with Dawson and discovered a tooth) and even the name of Arthur Conan Doyle has been mentioned, among many others.

I am unaware of the pig toe example, and was unable to find reference on-line for it.

Sounds a bit like religion in general to me, big difference though, evolutionary hoaxes are generally generated by the non-scientific community, are rather small in number compared to religious hoaxes, and most often pointed out by the evolution based scientists. Also, scientists frequently do not agree with them, as shown by the pitdown man example. Religious hoaxes are frequently perpetuated by mass belief in them.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Here comes another one , don't [B] ASS-U-ME that I just ask you a question. [/B]

ROFLMAO

🤣 😱

Whatever

Edit

thanks for fixing it.

Originally posted by Regret

Piltdown man had for some time become regarded as an aberration that was entirely inconsistent with the mainstream thrust of human evolution as demonstrated by fossil hominids found elsewhere. The identity of the Piltdown forger remains unknown. The finger of suspicion has been pointed at Dawson, Woodward, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (who worked at the site in 1913 with Dawson and discovered a tooth) and even the name of Arthur Conan Doyle has been mentioned, among many others.

I am unaware of the pig toe example, and was unable to find reference on-line for it.

Sounds a bit like religion in general to me, big difference though, evolutionary hoaxes are generally generated by the non-scientific community, are rather small in number compared to religious hoaxes, and most often pointed out by the evolution based scientists. Also, scientists frequently do not agree with them, as shown by the pitdown man example. Religious hoaxes are frequently perpetuated by mass belief in them.

Wow that's BS,hoaxes like heckels fake drawings which were used for 100 years was propagated by the scientific community.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why did you post ED's post like this? You should have quoted it.

He fixed it

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Wow that's BS,hoaxes like heckels fake drawings which were used for 100 years was propagated by the scientific community.

They were not used for 100 years, he admitted the hoax and was expelled from his university. This was not 100 years after the hoax. Scientists today do not rely on Heckel to support evolution.

Originally posted by Regret
They were not used for 100 years, he admitted the hoax and was expelled from his university. This was not 100 years after the hoax. Scientists today do not rely on Heckel to support evolution.

His sketches were found in text books even till this day what are you talking about?

I see this thing is still going on, when will they learn the difference between science and bullshit that's made up as we go along?

Originally posted by lord xyz
I see this thing is still going on, when will they learn the difference between science and bullshit that's made up as we go along?

When will you shut up 😕

When will you learn?

And thats your answer.

Why doesn't anyone quote me.............gosh........it's my birthday.......... 🙁

Originally posted by debbiejo
Why doesn't anyone quote me.............gosh........it's my birthday.......... 🙁

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
His sketches were found in text books even till this day what are you talking about?

Woot, I still see crap like intelligent design mentioned in textbooks and given about the same amount of credibility as the sketches, guess they publish just about anything in a text book 😛 Text Books aren't proof show me the current respected journal article that uses heckel's sketches as a source.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Why doesn't anyone quote me.............gosh........it's my birthday.......... 🙁

Because we're not worthy 😉 notworthy, and Happy Pre-B-Day!!!!!!!!!!

There, better?

Originally posted by Regret
Because we're not worthy 😉 notworthy, and Happy B-Day!!!!!!!!!!

It's not here Birthday, that's tomorrow. 😆

Well I'm busy tomorrow,,,,,..............so, it's today...........hahahaha

Originally posted by Regret
Woot, I still see crap like intelligent design mentioned in textbooks and given about the same amount of credibility as the sketches, guess they publish just about anything in a text book 😛 Text Books aren't proof show me the current respected journal article that uses heckel's sketches as a source.

Intelligent design isn't a hoax, like heckels fake sketches.
And how are text books not proof their documented?

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Intelligent design isn't a hoax, like heckels fake sketches.
And how are text books not proof their documented?

Text books aren't always peer reviewed. If you have proof that the textbooks you refer to are peer reviewed I'd like to see it.

Originally posted by Regret
Text books aren't always peer reviewed. If you have proof that the textbooks you refer to are peer reviewed I'd like to see it.

so what your saying is a journal is usually more reliable then a textbook 😕

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
so what your saying is a journal is usually more reliable then a textbook 😕

Yes. Textbooks vary in reliability. Some suck, some don't. Even journals sometimes suffer in reliability. Proper journal articles are peer reviewed by 5-20 professors in a given field. There is less chance of crap getting into a journal.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Why doesn't anyone quote me.............gosh........it's my birthday.......... 🙁

happybday, tomorrow
...and many more!