Now Ann Coulter Hates 911 Widows

Started by Capt_Fantastic8 pages
Originally posted by The Omega
This woman sounds – to me – like someone who knows FULL well the attention she’ll get from her radical hate-mongering views.
These people bask in the attention. The absolute WORST you can do to them is to… ignore them. = Put her on your personal “ignore”.

Originally posted by PVS
i disagree omega.
imho what really matters is the people who pay attention and agree with her excrement.
they are the ones who produce the demand. granted, the REACTION from the
opposition helps boost ratings/book sales, but i dont think flatout ignoring is good either.

people who disagree, but pay attention at least have the advantage of knowing their facist psychotic whore enemy.

Actually, you're both right.

Anne Coulter isn't stupid. She's intelligent, witty, etc. What you could say is that she's mean spirited.

Everyone realizes that she was talking about 4 specific 9/11 widows from New Jersey, right? She's talked about this in interviews since the book came out. Apparently hundreds of other 9/11 widows agree with here. Funny how 4 people get a bunch of attention, but the ones who aren't anti-Bush are just ignored.

there's my hasty 2 cents. (don't have time to say any more)

Originally posted by docb77
Anne Coulter isn't stupid. She's intelligent, witty, etc. What you could say is that she's mean spirited.

Everyone realizes that she was talking about 4 specific 9/11 widows from New Jersey, right? She's talked about this in interviews since the book came out. Apparently hundreds of other 9/11 widows agree with here. Funny how 4 people get a bunch of attention, but the ones who aren't anti-Bush are just ignored.

there's my hasty 2 cents. (don't have time to say any more)

ignored or just not attacked and accused of enjoying their husbands' deaths?
nice try at hugging her nuts.

Originally posted by PVS
ignored or just not attacked and accused of enjoying their husbands' deaths?
nice try at hugging her nuts.

You're one to talk, how about a little maturity. Yeah, she only attacked 4 of them, the so called "Jersey girls". And while I don't agree with how she made it, I do think her point is valid.

The point wasn't whether Coulter ignored them, it was that the media as a whole covered only the 4 and ignored the hundreds. That I think is the point she was trying to make.

Of course if we're to believe her interviews she's surprised that this is the only thing in the book that the left is really criticizing. She thought other things in there would be more provacative to the liberals. (don't ask me what, I haven't read any of her books)

Originally posted by docb77
You're one to talk, how about a little maturity. Yeah, she only attacked 4 of them, the so called "Jersey girls". And while I don't agree with how she made it, I do think her point is valid.

The point wasn't whether Coulter ignored them, it was that the media as a whole covered only the 4 and ignored the hundreds. That I think is the point she was trying to make.

Of course if we're to believe her interviews she's surprised that this is the only thing in the book that the left is really criticizing. She thought other things in there would be more provacative to the liberals. (don't ask me what, I haven't read any of her books)

these "hundreds" you claim are matched by "hundreds" who are against the war. the difference is that neither are being attacked by coulter just yet. and as far as her criticising, if you paid any attention to what they are saying, its a criticism for how sloppily 9-11 was handled and what little has been done to protect us from another. i guess they deserve to have words put in their mouths and be accused of enjoying the deaths of their loved ones, since you disagree with them. of coarse when widows appeared at bush's reelection campaign, they deserved respect and reverence, just as long as conservatives agree.

hypocrisy and double standards ROCK!!! 🤘

now, without parroting what coulter said, please present any quotes from the 'jersey girls' which you find offensive enough to attack in such a manner. i'll be waiting.

now the mindnumbing wingnut talking points are eroding my brain 😖
strike the comment on being against the war and replace with:

..."hundreds" who want questions answered about the events of 9/11 and what has been done as a result to safeguard us.

this is what they asked and this is why they are attacked:

1. Was NORAD aware of the four hijacked planes veering off course even before being reported by the FAA? If not, please explain why NORAD, which monitors 7000 flights a day, was unable to track the four aberrant flights.

2. At precisely what time was NORAD notified of each plane being hijacked? What was their response?

3. Who determined from which bases the F-16s should be scrambled? Why were fighter jets scrambled from such distant bases such as Langley Base in Va. instead of Andrews Air Force Base, a mere 10 miles from the Pentagon? Who were the pilots of these F-16s?

4. Why weren’t the jets able to intercept the hijacked planes if they were airborne within eight minutes of notification? What was their airspeed?

5. It is reported that there were two F-15s off the coast of Long Island while Flights 11 and 175 were in the air. If there were indeed fighters off Long Island, why weren’t they diverted to investigate Flights 11 and 175? Were any other military planes flying routine missions on the morning of September 11th which could have responded?

6. Why did NORAD wait until after the second plane hit the WTC to try and prevent possible further attacks? Why weren’t the fighter jets that tailed flights 11 and 175 as they crashed into New York’s WTC, immediately rerouted to intercept flights 77 or 93, before they crashed into the Pentagon and Pennsylvania?

7. Why wasn’t the Pentagon defended?

8. Were surveillance satellites orbiting North American airspace on 9/11?

• What exactly does the satellite imaging reveal?
• What companies own these satellites?
• Where are the records and logs for these orbits?

9. Why were these four planes able to evade all radar? Even when the transponders are disconnected, a plane is still able to be located by its “skin” on radar screens.

10. In June 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld modified NMCC response procedure in the event of a hijacking. Could this procedural change have slowed NORAD’s response time?

11. Who was directing the defense of our country that morning?

12. What defensive actions were ordered to protect our nation during the crisis?

Originally posted by PVS
these "hundreds" you claim are matched by "hundreds" who are against the war. the difference is that neither are being attacked by coulter just yet.

Actually neither of us can make that statement. I doubt that a survey has been done focusing on 9/11 widows. I drew my conclusions from the fact that Coulter said in some interview that 4 of these widows were critical, while she had heard from hundreds who thanked her for pointing out the hypocrisy of publicizing those 4 while ignoring them, even after they offered to be interviewed. Granted not an objective source, but I haven't really seen one yet.

Originally posted by PVS
and as far as her criticising, if you paid any attention to what they are saying, its a criticism for how sloppily 9-11 was handled and what little has been done to protect us from another. i guess they deserve to have words put in their mouths and be accused of enjoying the deaths of their loved ones, since you disagree with them. of coarse when widows appeared at bush's reelection campaign, they deserved respect and reverence, just as long as conservatives agree.

I believe I already said Coulter was wrong for how she made her point. But just because they are 9/11 widows doesn't mean that the other side can't respond.

Originally posted by PVS
now, without parroting what coulter said, please present any quotes from the 'jersey girls' which you find offensive enough to attack in such a manner. i'll be waiting.

I actually hadn't heard about them before this whole debate, still haven't seen any interviews or anything with them.

Originally posted by docb77
I believe I already said Coulter was wrong for how she made her point. But just because they are 9/11 widows doesn't mean that the other side can't respond.

as was asked to coulter, so shall i ask you: who the **** ever said that they could not be questioned? WHO?

Originally posted by PVS
as was asked to coulter, so shall i ask you: who the **** ever said that they could not be questioned? WHO?

What'd she say?

My answer would be this: The same people who tried to shut up the swiftboat guys during the kerry campaign. How about the newspeople who put the "Jersey girls" center stage, but refuse interviews with other 9/11 widows with different views.

Originally posted by docb77
What'd she say?

she just made a stupid face and accused him of instigating or whatever. she had no answer at all. follow the posted video clip and see for yourself. 😖

Originally posted by docb77
My answer would be this: The same people who tried to shut up the swiftboat guys during the kerry campaign. How about the newspeople who put the "Jersey girls" center stage, but refuse interviews with other 9/11 widows with different views.

and where is your proof that they refused to allow any other widows to speak out? give me a testimonial of a 9/11 widow who is against finding out everything that happened on 9/11, but was forbidden from speaking out by the bias liberal media. oh thats right, they dont exist. how do i know? if they did bill oreilly would have scooped them right up and paraded them all over fox news

http://www.people.virginia.edu/~jac3he/GiveUpQuiz/hitlercoulterquiz.html

Canada did not send troops to Vietnam.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Canada did not send troops to Vietnam.

OWNED

Her vacant eyes belong in a bukkake pink-eye porno, not on the news.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD2P3Fk0O3M&search=Coulter

Ann Cvnter's greatest hits

minus her wonderful articles cause she's careful never to say anything too islamophobic or antisemitic on the air.

Originally posted by BackFire
Her vacant eyes belong in a bukkake pink-eye porno, not on the news.

she isnt even worth that. perhaps some obscure fetish porn...maybe with a donkey using her face for a toilet...that may even be too kind.

Originally posted by PVS
she isnt even worth that. perhaps some obscure fetish porn...maybe with a donkey using her face for a toilet...that may even be too kind.

Bukkake is not obscure fetish porn?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Bukkake is not obscure fetish porn?

yeah, i guess 😛

you just live to contradict, dont you?

DONT ANSWER THAT!!!

...or that...

...or that...

...or that...

Originally posted by PVS
yeah, i guess 😛

you just live to contradict, dont you?

DONT ANSWER THAT!!!

...or that...

...or that...

...or that...

I do indeed get told that a lot, I disagree though, I think I live to point out the truth...I should get some sort of medal for it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I think I live to point out the truth

May I direct you to the conspiracy thread........