Originally posted by Count Kent
Galia and Mundi were more diplomatic in nature, and they have never displayed force power or mastery comparable to Maul, even in situations where they could have used the force, such as against Grievous.
And Maul has done what exactly to show his "Force mastery"? Push Obi-Wan Kenobi? Push a piece of metal? Choke a non-Force sensitive, weak-ass merc?
Originally posted by DePWNZOR
No, Grievous vs Maul is a closer match than Dooku vs Yoda. Yoda beats Dooku, and comes help Grievous beat Maul.
Wrong. Dooku vs Yoda is like a clash of the titans. It is not going to be a quick match. Yes Yoda is better but only slightly, Dooku will hold his ground for far more time than you are giving him credit for. Maul vs GG however will take far less time. Not that it wont be a close match. Maul will win while Yoda and Dooku are still fighting. Then Yoda will get double teamed.
Originally posted by DePWNZOR
No, Yoda had Dooku and would have killed him within about 10 seconds in that scene in attack of the clones. Dooku was losing the saber push, and would have been pwnd had he not cowardly tried distracting Yoda by doing that pillar thing. Maul vs Grievous is a lot closer than Yoda vs Dooku.
It is speculation whether he would have been killed if he hadnt used the pillar to distract Yoda. He had the plans for the death star on him and didnt wan them falling into the wrong hands. And from what i saw in the movie, Dooku was matching Yoda blow for blow. No where did we see that yoda had the advantage.
No, Yoda had Dooku and would have killed him within about 10 seconds in that scene in attack of the clones.
Disproven assumption. Dooku fights evenly with Yoda for at least 40 seconds. (Although I do feel Yoda is the better duelist).
Dooku was losing the saber push, and would have been pwnd had he not cowardly tried distracting Yoda by doing that pillar thing.
He was losing the "saber push"? Not sure what that is. The force fight was even, though it was quite clear neither side were going all out (Although, again, Yoda is the superior force user. I will not deny this).
Maul vs Grievous is a lot closer than Yoda vs Dooku
I actually think Maul will lose in a saber fight. Can he use the force to beat Grievous? I think he can. Either way, close fight.
Originally posted by Count Kent
Grievous is a non-issue when talking about warriors like Yoda or Maul. They just take him out with the force. Only minor force users like Mundi or Galia were unable to deal with Grievous.
You must be joking in 30 SECONDS dooku ran away form Yoda. Maul lost to a Padawan on the other hand grevious has killed more jedi than anyone in history. Not to mention he fought the third strongest master on the council even in an Injured state. May I remind you if Grevious would not have had that blaster Kenobi would have lost mabe not fairly but would have lst none the less. 馃槧
Originally posted by DePWNZOR
Maul can't use the force worth crapBy the "Saber Push", I mean at the end when they stop striking eachother and their sabers are Locked (I probably should have said Saber Lock) Yoda was pushing back Dooku's saber, and would have killed him then (with his body wide open to attack)
I must agree. In thirty seconds Dooku was pissing in his Pants and ran away and anyone who disagrees STFU.
Originally posted by Razielim
Ah, the saber lock. I see what you mean. Either way, Dooku can last 40-50 seconds against Yoda. Can Maul last that long against Grievous? I mean, master Kenobi >>> Padawan Kenobi by alot, and Padawan Kenobi was practically dominating their fight.A force choke might work, though.
Grevious has No neck and when has Maul used Force Choke 馃槙